Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
| Interaction Process Analysis | 130 |
| Sensitivity Training | 130 |
| Group Dynamics | 67 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 28 |
| Interpersonal Competence | 25 |
| Research Projects | 25 |
| Behavior Change | 16 |
| Human Relations | 16 |
| Individual Development | 16 |
| Laboratory Training | 16 |
| Group Behavior | 14 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Danish, Steven J. | 2 |
| Hurley, John R. | 2 |
| Jacobs, Marion | 2 |
| Lundgren, David C. | 2 |
| Mabry, Edward A. | 2 |
| Mezoff, Bob | 2 |
| Sikes, Walter W. | 2 |
| Smith, Peter B. | 2 |
| Adelson, Joseph P. | 1 |
| Allen, Robert M. | 1 |
| Althen, Gary L. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 14 |
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Guides - General | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Books | 1 |
| Dissertations/Theses | 1 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
| Israel | 1 |
| Montana | 1 |
| Ohio | 1 |
| Ohio (Cleveland) | 1 |
| Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh) | 1 |
| United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
| Vietnam | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Personal Orientation Inventory | 2 |
| Flanders System of… | 1 |
| Tennessee Self Concept Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kolodney, Nathan – Media Ecology Review, 1973
Article analyses the nature of artificial barriers which a technological society sets up between people by emphasizing product rather than product-as-a-part-of-process. Author looks at encounter groups attempts to break down these barriers. (HB)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Communication Problems, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedLakin, Martin – Counseling Psychologist, 1970
In response to William Coulson's article in this issue, the author is pleased that professionals are questioning their own roles in Encounter but is in general disagreement with Coulson's points regarding complete openness and feedback. (CJ)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Emotional Experience, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedOhlsen, Merle – Counseling Psychologist, 1970
In response to article by William Coulson in this issue the author is in general agreement with the points made by Coulson but expresses the wish that Coulson had also discussed what differentiates encounter groups from other techniques and professional training needed to prepare them adequately. (CJ)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Ethics, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Foster, Charles R. – Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2007
In 1998 the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching initiated a comprehensive study of professional education in the United States. By focusing on the interactions of teachers and students in the classroom and other formal and informal educational settings, the foundation hoped to discover how clergy, lawyers, engineers, doctors, and…
Descriptors: Professional Education, Student Surveys, Teacher Surveys, Theological Education
Hurley, John R.; Hurley, Shirley J. – J Counseling Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Evaluation, Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Group Experience
Johnson, Richard W.; Leonard, Louise C. – 1970
In an effort to determine the effectiveness of group counseling with student nurses, 76 students enrolled in their first professional nursing course were randomly placed either in a counseling group or in a control group. As hypothesized, those students participating in the group counseling sessions received significantly higher grades in the…
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Group Experience, Interaction
Peer reviewedO'Day, Rory – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This report focuses on differences in training style among four trainers as measured by the Training Style Scoring System. The study concludes that supportive and trusting interrelations between members develop when the leader permits open expression of hostility toward his/herself. The difficulty of allowing this is noted. (NG)
Descriptors: Classification, Group Experience, Individual Differences, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedMangham, Iain – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Presents a model of interaction and considers the implications of part of that model for intervention processes in T-group training. (Author)
Descriptors: Feedback, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedFrankiel, Harry H. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
In the present study, members of two trainer groups did not form relationships which were both mutually therapeutic and confronting so frequently as did members of one trainer groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedCoulson, William – Counseling Psychologist, 1970
Filmed accounts of a weekend encounter group explore the manner in which a group coalesces to the point where people talk about feelings rather than things." A group experience generally leads to a three stage" development in the lives of participants: (1) new openness with everyone; (2) crisis phase resulting from trying to change patterns of…
Descriptors: Discussion Groups, Feedback, Films, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedFisher, B. Aubrey – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Provides an insight into the group process of therapy and compares and contrasts the T-group process with therapy group process. The here-and-now orientation was present in T-group and therapy-group interaction. Greater relational conflict was present in the T-group. Members of the therapy group were much more defensive than members of the…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Communication (Thought Transfer), Conflict, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedDesmond, Richard E.; Seligman, Milton – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Analyzes research studies of leaderless groups in terms of specific variables which seem to be important for each study. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedGoodstein, Leonard D.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1976
In order to compare the evaluations of self-disclosure from three points of view--the sender, the receiver, and a neutral observer--self-rankings and group-rankings of self-disclosure were collected from 11 members of a weekend encounter group. Results indicate that content analyses yield quite different results from global analyses. (Author)
Descriptors: Interaction Process Analysis, Observation, Perception, Personality Assessment
Peer reviewedWalker, David N. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The nonverbal touching behavior of strangers in a dyadic interaction was studied to assess the current controversy between encounter group trainers and their critics concerning the use of nonverbal touching exercises to foster interpersonal openness. (Author)
Descriptors: Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Nonverbal Communication, Physical Activities
Godfrey, Eve – Industrial Training International, 1975
The author states her philosophy of self-directed learning in relation to ORD (Organizational Research and Development). (BP)
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, Foreign Countries, Individual Power, Interaction Process Analysis

Direct link
