Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
| Interaction Process Analysis | 130 |
| Sensitivity Training | 130 |
| Group Dynamics | 67 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 28 |
| Interpersonal Competence | 25 |
| Research Projects | 25 |
| Behavior Change | 16 |
| Human Relations | 16 |
| Individual Development | 16 |
| Laboratory Training | 16 |
| Group Behavior | 14 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Danish, Steven J. | 2 |
| Hurley, John R. | 2 |
| Jacobs, Marion | 2 |
| Lundgren, David C. | 2 |
| Mabry, Edward A. | 2 |
| Mezoff, Bob | 2 |
| Sikes, Walter W. | 2 |
| Smith, Peter B. | 2 |
| Adelson, Joseph P. | 1 |
| Allen, Robert M. | 1 |
| Althen, Gary L. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 14 |
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Guides - General | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Books | 1 |
| Dissertations/Theses | 1 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
| Israel | 1 |
| Montana | 1 |
| Ohio | 1 |
| Ohio (Cleveland) | 1 |
| Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh) | 1 |
| United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
| Vietnam | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Personal Orientation Inventory | 2 |
| Flanders System of… | 1 |
| Tennessee Self Concept Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedJacobson, Edward A.; Smith, Stephen J. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
It was concluded that Ss preferring low rates of social interchange show greater change following a weekend encounter group than initially high participators, possibly because the behavior of the former is more discrepant from encounter group norms and thus is confronted more. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Group Experience, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedMeador, Betty D. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971
The study adds further support to Rogers' process theory both in the direction of movement and the kinds of changes individuals make under the stated conditions. In addition, the study suggests that the weekend format induces greater process movement than in weekly time limited groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Group Dynamics, Individual Psychology, Interaction Process Analysis
Christ, Tanya; Wang, X. Christine – Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 2008
In order to become productive members of an academic community, it is important for students to master its procedural practices. By adapting Bourdieu's concepts of cultural capital, habitus, and field, we examined procedural practices of first-graders from minority and low-socioeconomic-status backgrounds in the context of student-led literacy…
Descriptors: Ethnography, Socioeconomic Influences, Qualitative Research, Classroom Communication
Peer reviewedMabry, Edward A. – Human Communication Research, 1975
Examines patterns of oral communication in encounter groups and identifies three stages of group life: boundary-seeking, ambivalence and actualization. (MH)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis
Soucie, Robert M. – Canadian Speech Communication Journal, 1972
Descriptors: Information Theory, Interaction Process Analysis, Kinesthetic Perception, Nonverbal Communication
Peer reviewedlieberman, Morton A.; And Others – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972
The major finding of the study is that, although encounter groups have an impact on their participants, what is carried away from the experience depends on particular characteristics of the group in interaction with what participants bring to it. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Group Dynamics, Groups, Individual Development
Peer reviewedKlein, Edward B.; Astrachan, Boris M. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
This paper focuses on a comparison of two models, with special attention to the ways in which authority and peer relations are viewed. The need for theoretical and technical amalgamation to advance our understanding of group phenomena is stressed. A comment by James Crowfoot, University of Michigan follows. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Groups, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedDanish, Steven J. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971
The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of the interaction of leader empathy, participant motivation to change, and leader-participant relationship. When a multiple regression analysis was used to observe the relationship between changes in effective sensitivity and the three variables, a significant positive relationship was found.…
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Emotional Development, Empathy, Group Experience
Peer reviewedWeinstein, Malcolm S.; Hanson, Robert – Small Group Behavior, 1975
This study is an initial report in a research program to examine the nature and influence of one set of structural variables--participation patterns--on patterns of interaction in sensitivity training groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Experience, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Lundberg, Joan, Lundberg, Craig – Training and Development Journal, 1974
The authors promote the position that the benefits tend to exceed the pitfalls of dual facilitation of intense small group experience and should become a more standard feature of laboratory training, for reasons of new trainer development, better learning experience for participants, and continuing skill development of experienced trainers. (AJ)
Descriptors: Cocounseling, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Laboratory Training
Peer reviewedNoll, Gary A.; Watkins, John T. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1974
Differences on the Personal Orientation Inventory between 39 males and 40 females who participated in encounter groups and 40 males and 44 females who declined to participate in such groups were examined. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Individual Development, Interaction Process Analysis
Rothaus, Paul; And others – J Genet Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Adolescents, Group Dynamics, Group Membership, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedLundgren, David C. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The current study analyses developmental trends in sensitivity training groups by exploring the sequence of interpersonal issues or problem areas which emerge at different periods in the life span of such groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewedEpps, Jerry D.; Sikes, Walter W. – Group and Organization Studies, 1977
The study discussed here attempts to shed further light on the influences that differences in characteristics of personal-growth group participants have on the quality of their experiences. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Experience, Group Membership, Group Therapy, Individual Development
Peer reviewedCarlock, Charlene J.; Martin, Patricia Yancey – Social Work, 1977
An increase in the formation of growth-oriented groups has accompanied a rising interest in self-knowledge and consciousness-raising. The study described in this article suggests that the behaviors, perceptions, and emotional experiences of group members may vary with the sexual makeup of the group itself. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship

Direct link
