Descriptor
| Feedback | 8 |
| Interaction Process Analysis | 8 |
| Sensitivity Training | 8 |
| Group Dynamics | 5 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 3 |
| Research Projects | 3 |
| Behavior Patterns | 2 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Group Behavior | 2 |
| Verbal Communication | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 3 |
| Journal of Consulting and… | 2 |
| Counseling Psychologist | 1 |
| Counselor Educ Superv | 1 |
Author
| Jacobs, Marion | 2 |
| Adelson, Joseph P. | 1 |
| Coulson, William | 1 |
| Mangham, Iain | 1 |
| McClain, Edwin W. | 1 |
| Pattinson, Pamela R. | 1 |
| Thompson, George W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedJacobs, Marion; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973
Positive feedback was found to be more desirable and tended to be more believable than negative feedback. A third group, which received a mixture of positive and negative feedback, rated the T group lowest as a learning experience. No significant differences in cohesion resulted from the different feedback conditions. (Author)
Descriptors: Feedback, Group Dynamics, Individual Development, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedMangham, Iain – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Presents a model of interaction and considers the implications of part of that model for intervention processes in T-group training. (Author)
Descriptors: Feedback, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedCoulson, William – Counseling Psychologist, 1970
Filmed accounts of a weekend encounter group explore the manner in which a group coalesces to the point where people talk about feelings rather than things." A group experience generally leads to a three stage" development in the lives of participants: (1) new openness with everyone; (2) crisis phase resulting from trying to change patterns of…
Descriptors: Discussion Groups, Feedback, Films, Group Dynamics
Thompson, George W. – 1968
Concentrating on theory and practice on sensitivity training groups (T groups) in human relations training laboratories, this study investigates aspects of the process whereby participants are said to learn cooperatively about their group and about themselves as members. As evidenced by training "dilemmas" noted in the literature, relevant T group…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Conflict, Doctoral Dissertations, Feedback
Peer reviewedJacobs, Marion – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977
Undergraduates (N = 96), divided into 12 groups, first engaged in self-disclosure and consensus exercises and then were required to exchange personal feedback. Feedback was positive or negative in nature and delivered publicly or anonymously. Positive feedback was rated as more credible and produced greater cohesiveness. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Feedback, Group Experience
Peer reviewedAdelson, Joseph P. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The role of feedback in T-groups was studied. Results indicate that feedback increases as T-groups progress, feedback is more emotional and non-evaluative than cognitive in nature, positive and direct feedback to the leaders increases as the group develops, and specific feedback between members increases as groups progress. (SE)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Feedback, Group Behavior
McClain, Edwin W. – Counselor Educ Superv, 1969
Descriptors: Counseling Effectiveness, Counselor Training, Feedback, Group Therapy
Peer reviewedPattinson, Pamela R.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The present study examines the effects of immediate feedback to the therapist. It was hypothesized that immediate feedback would increase the amount of therapeutic talk by the therapist, as defined by the HIM. (Author)
Descriptors: Feedback, Group Behavior, Health Personnel, Helping Relationship
