Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 6 |
| Interaction Process Analysis | 6 |
| Sensitivity Training | 6 |
| Research Projects | 5 |
| Group Dynamics | 3 |
| Classification | 2 |
| Counseling Effectiveness | 2 |
| Graduate Students | 2 |
| Group Counseling | 2 |
| Measurement Instruments | 2 |
| Self Concept | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Barr, Joseph E. | 1 |
| Conyne, Robert K. | 1 |
| Jacobs, Marion | 1 |
| Rapin, Lynn S. | 1 |
| Schwartz, Lester J. | 1 |
| Silbergeld, Sam | 1 |
| Sisson, C. J. | 1 |
| Ware, J. Roger | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Personal Orientation Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schwartz, Lester J.; And Others – 1973
This study attempted to examine whether growth groups are an effective training technique in counselor education. Two experimental groups which differed in group size and the amount of time devoted to the group experience were compared to a control group. Improved congruence between real and ideal self was found in the students who participated in…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Counselor Training, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedConyne, Robert K.; Rapin, Lynn S. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Compares the relative effectiveness of facilitator-directed (FD) and self-directed (SD) programmed treatments on the same participants. The programmed treatments were tested for their capacity to induce change in the quality of group member verbal interaction, and for their differential semantic meaning. Results are inconclusive. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness, Graduate Students, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedSilbergeld, Sam; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
To assess two group models being developed in the Mental Health Study Center, NIMH, this paper compares HIM data from these models with norms from a previous study. By contrasting HIM results from groups of married couples, young adolescents, and parents and teachers, one obtains a better understanding of the effectiveness of these models. (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedJacobs, Marion – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977
Undergraduates (N = 96), divided into 12 groups, first engaged in self-disclosure and consensus exercises and then were required to exchange personal feedback. Feedback was positive or negative in nature and delivered publicly or anonymously. Positive feedback was rated as more credible and produced greater cohesiveness. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Feedback, Group Experience
Peer reviewedSisson, C. J.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The purpose of this investigation is to compare the descriptions of group process obtained from the Hill Interaction Matrix (Form G) and the Bonney Scale in rating an extended counseling group of psychiatric residents (N = 10). (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Conceptual Schemes, Graduate Students
Peer reviewedWare, J. Roger; Barr, Joseph E. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Investigates the amount of structure furnished by the leader in the group experience over a nine-week period and its effects on measures of self-concept and self-actualization. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness, Group Counseling, Group Therapy


