NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)1
Since 2007 (last 20 years)1
Education Level
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Larry P v Riles2
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 30 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gentry, Marcia; Desmet, Ophélie Allyssa; Karami, Sareh; Lee, Hyeseong; Green, Corinne; Cress, Alissa; Chowkase, Aakash; Gray, Anne – Roeper Review, 2021
In this article, we reviewed how intelligence tests were developed and normed, with a careful eye to underserved groups. Based on state recommendations, five group-administered and five individually-administered tests were reviewed for demographics; invariance testing; validity and reliability reporting; and gifted identification suitability. We…
Descriptors: Gifted Education, High Stakes Tests, Ability Identification, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carvajal, Howard; McKnab, Paul – Gifted Child Quarterly, 1990
Fifty gifted students, aged 9-17, were tested with the gifted identification battery from Stanford-Binet IV and the SRA Educational Ability Series (EAS). The EAS was found to be a feasible test for screening gifted students. The discrepancies between the standard scores of the two tests were low and favored the EAS. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Tests
Hammill, Donald – J Sch Psychol, 1968
Investigation of test reliability when administered and scored by teachers without testing experience upheld contention that it be used as quick screening device and be given by classroom teachers. (CJ)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Intelligence Tests, Measurement Instruments, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sevier, Robert; And Others – Roeper Review, 1994
Thirty-five gifted elementary children were tested with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III (WISC-III) and results were compared to a previous administration of the WISC (Revised). Scores were significantly higher on all three WISC-R global scales and most subtest scaled scores. Correlation coefficients between the tests were…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Testing, Correlation, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wallen, Norman E. – Social Education, 1984
Theoretical, technical, and practical charges which have been made against the IQ test in recent years are examined. Teachers need to be aware of these issues, since IQ testing directly affects perceptions of, and planning for, their students. (RM)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academic Achievement, Educational Needs, Educational Objectives
Fishkin, Anne S.; Kampsnider, John J. – 1996
Since the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) was published in 1991, it has been reported that fewer students are qualifying for gifted programs that use the WISC-III as a criterion measure. WISC-III differs from the WISC-Revised (WISC-R) in having a greater emphasis on speed of response, which could…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Children, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Silverman, Linda; Kearney, Kathi – 1992
This article maintains that the older Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Form L-M) is the best tool for assessing extraordinarily gifted children despite the acknowledged deficits of the scale in comparison with newer instruments. Although the article finds that the Stanford-Binet uses outdated terminology, is highly verbal, has 20-year-old norms,…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Elementary Secondary Education, Eligibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harrington, Robert G. – Education, 1982
Suggests improper application of standardized IQ tests may misidentify or underrefer thousands of intellectually gifted students each year. Presents 10 hazards that can bias IQ scores of gifted children and cautions psychological examiners and consumers of IQ test information to be aware of these hazards. (Author/AH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fishkin, Anne S.; And Others – Roeper Review, 1996
This study investigated patterns of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) Third Edition subtest scores for 42 gifted children in grades 4-8. Variability from subtest means was highest on Similarities, Comprehension, Coding, and Symbol Search subtests. Significant weaknesses were found on the Block Design subtest, seen as a peak subtest…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cluster Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted
Carvajal, Howard; And Others – Diagnostique, 1989
Forty-five gifted children, ages 11-17, were tested with the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement. Results indicated 18 of 20 correlations between the area and composite scores were significant. The Stanford-Binet Short-Term Memory standard age score mean was lower than other scores' means. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McDermott, Paul A.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1992
This study analyzed the relative efficacy of normative (population relative) and ipsative (person relative) measures for the study of intraindividual and interindividual differences in child ability. Ipsative ability measures were found to be uniformly inferior to their normative counterparts and conveyed no uniquely useful information. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Individual Differences
Levin, Henry M. – 1988
The use of ability testing for job selection has become widespread in the Federal Government and in the U.S. Employment Service, which assists private sector employers. The justification for the practice is based largely on research findings claiming a high level of validity for such tests in predicting job performance. More recently, such claims…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Aptitude Tests, Educational Research, Intelligence Tests
Gonda, Judith; Schaie, K. Warner – 1978
Because conventional test instruments designed to predict academic performance of the young tend to be inaccurate measures of competence in the elderly, new assessment instruments are being constructed which are more appropriate for current cohorts of the elderly. A comparison of performance on conventional measures to performance on newly…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Age Differences, Age Groups, Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Matthews, Dona J. – Roeper Review, 1988
The efficacy of Raven's Matrices in the gifted identification process is reviewed, focusing on their reliability, validity, and fairness and comparing them with other intelligence tests. It is concluded that, despite problems with narrowness of scope and standardization practices, these tests provide a useful screening device for intellectually…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Muir, Sharon Pray – Social Education, 1984
Discusses criticism leveled at intelligence tests, including cultural and ethnic bias, charges related to content validity, and the ongoing debate of the relative influence of heredity and environment. Many popular attacks are misguided. (RM)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cultural Background, Cultural Differences, Elementary Secondary Education
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2