NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Test Rankings and Selection Procedures for Identifying Gifted Intermediate Elementary Students
Doughty, Earl – Illinois School Research, 1971
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary School Students, Gifted, Group Testing
Prediction of WAIS Scores from Group Ability Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Watson, Charles G.; Klett, William G. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1973
In a search for an adequate but efficient substitute, the authors have instituted three evaluations of the relationships between potential WAIS-substitutes and the WAIS itself. The present report describes the first of these researches-- a study of the relationships between the four group ability tests and the WAIS in a mental hospital setting.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Group Testing, Institutionalized Persons, Intelligence Tests
The Learning Potential Assessment Device and Instrumental Enrichment as a Paradigm Shift
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hilliard, Asa G., III – Negro Educational Review, 1987
The Learning Potential Assessment Device and Instrumental Enrichment are two much needed improvements in education. Used in tandem, they rectify previous problems of testing and teaching by providing an unbiased assessment device which does not rely on labels for categories of learners. (VM)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Educational Change, Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education
Predicting the Academic Achievement of the Acoustically-Impaired Using Intelligence and Self-Concept of Academic Ability
Joiner, Lee M.; And Others – J Spec Educ, 1969
Revision of a paper presented at the National Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, St. Louis, April 1967. (Author)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academic Achievement, Evaluation, Exceptional Child Research
Use of the Stanford Binet Fourth Edition in Identifying Young Gifted Children.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kitano, Margie K.; DeLeon, Josie – Roeper Review, 1988
The impact of the Stanford Binet Fourth Edition was compared with the Stanford Binet L-M on the identification of gifted children for a university affiliated preschool. The fourth edition test composite identified fewer preschool age children as gifted when the criterion was set at 1.5 standard deviations above the mean. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Analysis, Gifted, Intelligence Tests
Identification of Gifted Children: A Comparison of the Scores on Stanford-Binet 4th Edition and Form LM.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kluever, Raymond C.; Green, Kathy E. – Roeper Review, 1990
Composite scores for 51 gifted children (ages 3-12) on the Stanford-Binet LM were found to be significantly higher than scores on the Stanford-Binet 4th Edition. Correlations between the LM total and 4th Edition area scores were significant. Results suggest that the 4th Edition composite score cut-off value for assessing giftedness may require…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Eligibility
Intellectual Assessment of Hispanic Children.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clarizio, Harvey F. – Psychology in the Schools, 1982
Examines whether individual intelligence tests such as the WISC-R are biased against Hispanic school-aged children. Discusses three common but faulty notions of test bias, and advances a psychometric definition of bias. Analyzes evidence regarding external and internal validity. Presents guidelines for intellectual assessment of bilingual…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Bilingual Students, Children, Elementary Secondary Education
Research on the Adaptive Behavior Inventory for Children and the Estimated Learning Potential.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Oakland, Thomas – School Psychology Digest, 1979
Validity data are provided for the Adaptive Behavior Inventory for Children (ABIC) and the Estimated Learning Potential (ELP) which are components of the System of Multicultural Pluralistic Assessment (SOMPA). Results lead the author to conclude that caution is indicated in the use of the two procedures. (JKS)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adjustment (to Environment), Culture Fair Tests, Educational Testing