Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Advanced Placement Programs | 1 |
| Educational Legislation | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Learning | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Performance Factors | 1 |
| Predictor Variables | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Schunn, Christian D. | 1 |
| Wu, Yong | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkWu, Yong; Schunn, Christian D. – American Educational Research Journal, 2021
Research has shown that engaging students in peer feedback can help students revise documents and improve their writing skills. But the mechanistic pathways by which skills develop have remained untested: Does receiving and providing feedback lead to learning because it produces more extensive revision behavior or is such immediate implementation…
Descriptors: Writing Improvement, Revision (Written Composition), Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
