Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Information Retrieval | 2 |
| Metadata | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Citations (References) | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Synthesis Methods | 2 |
Author
| Hong, Quan Nha | 1 |
| Langlois, Alexis | 1 |
| Nie, Jian-Yun | 1 |
| Pallath, Akash | 1 |
| Pluye, Pierre | 1 |
| Thomas, James | 1 |
| Zhang, Qiyang | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPallath, Akash; Zhang, Qiyang – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Systematic reviews are vital instruments for researchers to understand broad trends in a field and synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of interventions in addressing specific issues. The quality of a systematic review depends critically on having comprehensively surveyed all relevant literature on the review topic. In addition to database…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Online Searching, Automation, Citations (References)
Langlois, Alexis; Nie, Jian-Yun; Thomas, James; Hong, Quan Nha; Pluye, Pierre – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Objective: Identify the most performant automated text classification method (eg, algorithm) for differentiating empirical studies from nonempirical works in order to facilitate systematic mixed studies reviews. Methods: The algorithms were trained and validated with 8050 database records, which had previously been manually categorized as…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Databases, Information Retrieval, Search Strategies
