Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Individual Testing | 2 |
| Learning Experience | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| Courses | 1 |
| Differences | 1 |
| Group Dynamics | 1 |
| Group Testing | 1 |
| Group Unity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Butter, Eliot J. | 1 |
| Linas Mitchell | 1 |
| R. Scott Tindale | 1 |
| Rayne Bozeman | 1 |
| Robyn K. Mallett | 1 |
| Snyder, Frederick R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Matching Familiar Figures Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkRayne Bozeman; Robyn K. Mallett; Linas Mitchell; R. Scott Tindale – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2024
Two-phase testing assesses individual performance (phase 1) and then allows collaborative learning within small groups (phase 2). While groups typically outperform individuals, less is known about the social decision schemes that influence member collaboration. In a classroom setting, we compared individual and group performance on a standard test…
Descriptors: Testing, Group Testing, Cooperative Learning, Learning Experience
Peer reviewedButter, Eliot J.; Snyder, Frederick R. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Third grade children (n=24) who were administered the standard, simultaneous version of the Matching Familiar Figures test committed fewer errors when administered a sequential version of the same test than did subjects (n=24) who took the more difficult sequential version first. (PN)
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Comparative Analysis, Individual Testing, Learning Experience
