Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Context Effect | 3 |
| Individual Testing | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Group Testing | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Blended Learning | 1 |
| Child Behavior | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Contingency Management | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wiskow, Katie M.; Donaldson, Jeanne M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2016
We compared the effects of Lag 0 and Lag 1 schedules of reinforcement on children's responses naming category items in a group context and subsequent responses emitted during individual testing in which the schedule of reinforcement remained Lag 0. Specifically, we measured response variability and novel responses to categories for 3 children who…
Descriptors: Naming, Children, Reinforcement, Context Effect
McCall, Megan O'Neill – ProQuest LLC, 2017
This study examined the effects of cooperative testing versus traditional or individual testing and the impacts on academic achievement, motivation toward science, and study time for 9th grade biology students. Research questions centered on weekly quizzes given in a flipped classroom format for a period of 13 weeks. The study used a mixed methods…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Group Testing, Academic Achievement, Learning Motivation
Fuchs, Douglas; Fuchs, Lynn S. – 1985
This article presents a meta-analysis of the effects of examiner familiarity/unfamiliarity on children's performance during individual testing. Data came from 22 controlled studies involving 1489 subjects. In a typical study, the effect of examiner familiarity raised test performance by .35 standard deviations. Differential performance favoring…
Descriptors: Context Effect, Disabilities, Effect Size, Examiners

Peer reviewed
Direct link
