Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Alternative Assessment | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Group Testing | 2 |
| Individual Testing | 2 |
| Student Evaluation | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Camilli, Gregory | 1 |
| Desrochers, Marcie N. | 1 |
| Fink, Herbert C. | 1 |
| Kimmerling, Joe | 1 |
| Thomas, Andrea | 1 |
| Tung, Wendy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Camilli, Gregory – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2013
In the attempt to identify or prevent unfair tests, both quantitative analyses and logical evaluation are often used. For the most part, fairness evaluation is a pragmatic attempt at determining whether procedural or substantive due process has been accorded to either a group of test takers or an individual. In both the individual and comparative…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Test Bias, Test Content, Test Format
Desrochers, Marcie N.; Fink, Herbert C.; Thomas, Andrea; Kimmerling, Joe; Tung, Wendy – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2007
Alternatives to a solitary testing format can involve students working in teams to arrive at the correct answer. We compared two group assessment methods, cooperative and competitive, to a solitary testing approach. In most comparisons examining the undergraduate respondents' (N = 77) performance, the two group-testing methods were equivalent.…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Alternative Assessment, Group Testing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
