Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Individual Development | 3 |
| Moral Development | 3 |
| Ethics | 2 |
| Moral Values | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Classroom Techniques | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Conservation (Environment) | 1 |
| Cooperation | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Narvaez, Darcia | 3 |
| Bock, Tonia | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Defining Issues Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Narvaez, Darcia – Journal of Moral Education, 2021
Stories of civilization and progress tell us that humans cannot help being destructive, selfish, and aggressive, which are side effects of progress requiring sanctions and engineering. It can be argued that this approach has brought about the ecological collapse we face today. The older, more widespread view--that human personality and behavior…
Descriptors: Moral Values, Moral Development, Ecology, Human Dignity
Moral Schemas and Tacit Judgement or How the Defining Issues Test Is Supported by Cognitive Science.
Peer reviewedNarvaez, Darcia; Bock, Tonia – Journal of Moral Education, 2002
Discusses three core moral judgement ideas: (1) modern schema theory, (2) automatic decision-making frequency, and (3) implicit processes as the default mode of human information processing. Compares the Defining Issues Test (measures the beginnings of moral judgement) and the Lawrence Kohlberg Moral Judgement Interview (measures the highest level…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewedNarvaez, Darcia – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1993
Analysis of scholastic test information and scores on the Defining Issues Test (DIT) of moral judgment for 122 eighth graders found a wide variation in DIT scores among high cognitive ability subjects, but no high scores among low ability subjects, suggesting that high cognitive ability is necessary but not sufficient for high moral judgment. (DB)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development, Ethics, Gifted

Direct link
