NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)0
Since 2007 (last 20 years)3
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Purrazzella, Kimberly; Mechling, Linda C. – Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 2013
The study employed a multiple probe design to investigate the effects of computer-based instruction (CBI) and a forward chaining procedure to teach manual spelling of words to three young adults with moderate intellectual disability in a small group arrangement. The computer-based program included a tablet PC whereby students wrote words directly…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Spelling Instruction, Incidental Learning, Observational Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ledford, Jennifer R.; Gast, David L.; Luscre, Deanna; Ayres, Kevin M. – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2008
This study evaluated the acquisition of incidental and observational information presented to 6 children with autism in a small group instructional arrangement using a constant time delay (CTD) procedure. A multiple probe design across behaviors, replicated across 6 participants, was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the CTD procedure and to…
Descriptors: Small Group Instruction, Autism, Incidental Learning, Reading Ability
Hanley-Maxwell, Cheryl; And Others – Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1982
Six moderately retarded adolescents were each taught 10 reading vocabulary words in the presence of the group. Ss were tested periodically on their own 10 words, 50 words presented to peers, and 10 uninstructed control words. Ss showed significant learning of their own words, with some also learning their classmates' words. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Incidental Learning, Moderate Mental Retardation, Small Group Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Campbell, Monica L.; Mechling, Linda C. – Remedial and Special Education, 2009
This investigation examined the effectiveness of teaching letter sounds in a small group arrangement using computer-assisted instruction with SMART Board technology and a 3s constant time delay procedure to three students with learning disabilities. A multiple probe design across letter sound sets and replicated across students evaluate the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Small Group Instruction, Stimuli, Investigations
Wadsworth, Barry; Flagg, Barbara – 1971
Two separate studies were conducted: 1) one examining the effect on sixth grade subjects (N=113) of relevant questions occurring shortly after reading textual material on posttraining tests to a control condition not receiving the questions, and 2) one replicating it and also examining learning in small group (individual-like situations) as well…
Descriptors: College Students, Elementary School Students, Incidental Learning, Questioning Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shelton, Betty Sue; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1991
Eight students (ages 9-12) with mild mental retardation were instructed in sight-word reading in 2 small groups. Results showed that the time delay procedure was effective, that students learned other students' words through observation, and that students learned some incidental information. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Incidental Learning, Instructional Effectiveness, Intermediate Grades, Mild Mental Retardation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keel, Marie C.; Gast, David L. – Exceptional Children, 1992
Three fifth grade students with learning disabilities were taught to recognize multisyllabic basal vocabulary words using constant time delay in a small-group instructional arrangement and were assessed on ability to recognize, spell, and define both their own target words and observational words. The procedure was effective in establishing…
Descriptors: Definitions, Incidental Learning, Instructional Effectiveness, Intermediate Grades
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Doyle, Patricia Munson; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1990
Constant time delay was found to be an effective strategy in teaching targeted facts to four secondary-age students with mild and moderate mental retardation. Students also learned other students' target facts through observation and learned incidental information embedded in the consequent event following correct responding. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Incidental Learning, Instructional Effectiveness, Mild Mental Retardation, Moderate Mental Retardation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Warren, Steven F. – Journal of Early Intervention, 1992
Five children (27 to 47 months old) with mild to borderline levels of mental retardation were given a milieu language intervention program of 3 or 4 small group training sessions weekly. Results indicated the training had a clear facilitative effect on the acquisition and generalized use of common nouns and verbs by four of the subjects.…
Descriptors: Early Intervention, Educational Environment, Generalization, Incidental Learning
Harrell, Peggy L.; And Others – 1992
This study of two groups of four children (ages 6-9) with learning disabilities evaluated the effects of two contingencies (independent and interdependent) on the learning of students with learning and behavioral disabilities when conducted in small groups with constant time delay. Measures were collected on the rapidity with which children…
Descriptors: Educational Strategies, Elementary Education, Feedback, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolery, Mark; And Others – Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 1990
This study found that constant time delay was effective in teaching word reading to four students (ages seven to eight) with mild handicaps. Individual attentional response was more effective and efficient in learning to spell words than in choral attentional response. Observational and incidental learning occurred for all students. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Attention, Beginning Reading, Incidental Learning, Individualized Programs