Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Differences | 2 |
| Incidental Learning | 2 |
| Brain | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Direct Instruction | 1 |
| Dyslexia | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Literature Reviews | 1 |
| Reaction Time | 1 |
| Reading | 1 |
Author
| Altoè, Gianmarco | 1 |
| Batterink, Laura J. | 1 |
| Mulatti, Claudio | 1 |
| Paller, Ken A. | 1 |
| Reber, Paul J. | 1 |
| Schmalz, Xenia | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schmalz, Xenia; Altoè, Gianmarco; Mulatti, Claudio – Annals of Dyslexia, 2017
The existing literature on developmental dyslexia (hereafter: dyslexia) often focuses on isolating cognitive skills which differ across dyslexic and control participants. Among potential correlates, previous research has studied group differences between dyslexic and control participants in performance on statistical learning tasks. A statistical…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Incidental Learning, Differences, Literature Reviews
Batterink, Laura J.; Reber, Paul J.; Paller, Ken A. – Learning & Memory, 2015
Humans are capable of rapidly extracting regularities from environmental input, a process known as statistical learning. This type of learning typically occurs automatically, through passive exposure to environmental input. The presumed function of statistical learning is to optimize processing, allowing the brain to more accurately predict and…
Descriptors: Incidental Learning, Direct Instruction, Reaction Time, Cognitive Processes

Peer reviewed
Direct link
