Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| At Risk Students | 2 |
| Elementary School Students | 2 |
| Identification | 2 |
| Mathematics Tests | 2 |
| Alphabets | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Goodness of Fit | 1 |
| Guides | 1 |
| Information Systems | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Behavioral Research and… | 2 |
Author
| Alonzo, Julie | 2 |
| Anderson, Daniel | 2 |
| Tindal, Gerald | 2 |
| Farley, Dan | 1 |
| Irvin, P. Shawn | 1 |
| Lai, Cheng-Fei | 1 |
| Saven, Jessica L. | 1 |
| Wray, Kraig A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Kindergarten | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Anderson, Daniel; Alonzo, Julie; Tindal, Gerald; Farley, Dan; Irvin, P. Shawn; Lai, Cheng-Fei; Saven, Jessica L.; Wray, Kraig A. – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2014
Since the easyCBM© learning system was first published in 2006, over $8 million of federal funding (both from the Office of Special Education Programs and more recently from the Institute of Education Sciences) has been used to develop, study, and refine the assessments available on the system. This Technical Manual summarizes the ongoing research…
Descriptors: Guides, Reading Tests, Mathematics Tests, Spanish
Alonzo, Julie; Anderson, Daniel; Tindal, Gerald – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2009
We present scaling outcomes for mathematics assessments used in the fall to screen students at risk of failing to learn the knowledge and skills described in the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Focal Point Standards. At each grade level, the assessment consisted of a 48-item test with three 16-item sub-test sets aligned to the…
Descriptors: At Risk Students, Mathematics Teachers, National Standards, Item Response Theory


