Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 12 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 12 |
Descriptor
Identification | 12 |
Cheating | 10 |
Statistical Analysis | 9 |
Statistical Distributions | 5 |
Testing Problems | 5 |
Deception | 4 |
Item Response Theory | 4 |
Bayesian Statistics | 3 |
Computation | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Achievement Gains | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Grantee Submission | 5 |
Journal of Educational and… | 3 |
Educational and Psychological… | 2 |
Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Author
Sinharay, Sandip | 12 |
Johnson, Matthew S. | 5 |
Duong, Minh Q. | 1 |
Harring, Jeffrey R. | 1 |
Man, Kaiwen | 1 |
Peng, Luyao | 1 |
Wood, Scott W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 12 |
Journal Articles | 7 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
The Use of Theory of Linear Mixed-Effects Models to Detect Fraudulent Erasures at an Aggregate Level
Peng, Luyao; Sinharay, Sandip – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Wollack et al. (2015) suggested the erasure detection index (EDI) for detecting fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly (2017) and Sinharay (2018) extended the index of Wollack et al. (2015) to suggest three EDIs for detecting fraudulent erasures at the aggregate or group level. This article follows up on the research of…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, Statistical Analysis, Testing
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2021
Score differencing is one of the six categories of statistical methods used to detect test fraud (Wollack & Schoenig, 2018) and involves the testing of the null hypothesis that the performance of an examinee is similar over two item sets versus the alternative hypothesis that the performance is better on one of the item sets. We suggest, to…
Descriptors: Probability, Bayesian Statistics, Cheating, Statistical Analysis
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Grantee Submission, 2021
Score differencing is one of six categories of statistical methods used to detect test fraud (Wollack & Schoenig, 2018) and involves the testing of the null hypothesis that the performance of an examinee is similar over two item sets versus the alternative hypothesis that the performance is better on one of the item sets. We suggest, to…
Descriptors: Probability, Bayesian Statistics, Cheating, Statistical Analysis
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Grantee Submission, 2019
According to Wollack and Schoenig (2018), score differencing is one of six types of statistical methods used to detect test fraud. In this paper, we suggested the use of Bayes factors (e.g., Kass & Raftery, 1995) for score differencing. A simulation study shows that the suggested approach performs slightly better than an existing frequentist…
Descriptors: Cheating, Deception, Statistical Analysis, Bayesian Statistics
Man, Kaiwen; Harring, Jeffrey R.; Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2019
Data mining methods have drawn considerable attention across diverse scientific fields. However, few applications could be found in the areas of psychological and educational measurement, and particularly pertinent to this article, in test security research. In this study, various data mining methods for detecting cheating behaviors on large-scale…
Descriptors: Information Retrieval, Data Analysis, Identification, Tests
Sinharay, Sandip – Grantee Submission, 2019
Benefiting from item preknowledge (e.g., McLeod, Lewis, & Thissen, 2003) is a major type of fraudulent behavior during educational assessments. This paper suggests a new statistic that can be used for detecting the examinees who may have benefitted from item preknowledge using their response times. The statistic quantifies the difference in…
Descriptors: Test Items, Cheating, Reaction Time, Identification
Sinharay, Sandip; Duong, Minh Q.; Wood, Scott W. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2017
As noted by Fremer and Olson, analysis of answer changes is often used to investigate testing irregularities because the analysis is readily performed and has proven its value in practice. Researchers such as Belov, Sinharay and Johnson, van der Linden and Jeon, van der Linden and Lewis, and Wollack, Cohen, and Eckerly have suggested several…
Descriptors: Identification, Statistics, Change, Tests
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Grantee Submission, 2019
According to Wollack and Schoenig (2018), benefitting from item preknowledge is one of the three broad types of test fraud that occur in educational assessments. We use tools from constrained statistical inference to suggest a new statistic that is based on item scores and response times and can be used to detect the examinees who may have…
Descriptors: Scores, Test Items, Reaction Time, Cheating
Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2018
Wollack, Cohen, and Eckerly suggested the "erasure detection index" (EDI) to detect fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly extended the EDI to detect fraudulent erasures at the group level. The EDI at the group level was found to be slightly conservative. This article suggests two modifications of the EDI for…
Descriptors: Deception, Identification, Testing Problems, Cheating
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
In a pioneering research article, Wollack and colleagues suggested the "erasure detection index" (EDI) to detect test tampering. The EDI can be used with or without a continuity correction and is assumed to follow the standard normal distribution under the null hypothesis of no test tampering. When used without a continuity correction,…
Descriptors: Deception, Identification, Testing Problems, Error of Measurement
Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2017
An increasing concern of producers of educational assessments is fraudulent behavior during the assessment (van der Linden, 2009). Benefiting from item preknowledge (e.g., Eckerly, 2017; McLeod, Lewis, & Thissen, 2003) is one type of fraudulent behavior. This article suggests two new test statistics for detecting individuals who may have…
Descriptors: Test Items, Cheating, Testing Problems, Identification
Sinharay, Sandip – Grantee Submission, 2017
Wollack, Cohen, and Eckerly (2015) suggested the "erasure detection index" (EDI) to detect fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly (2017) extended the EDI to detect fraudulent erasures at the group level. The EDI at the group level was found to be slightly conservative. This paper suggests two modifications of…
Descriptors: Deception, Identification, Testing Problems, Cheating