Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Hypothesis Testing | 24 |
| Monte Carlo Methods | 24 |
| Statistical Significance | 24 |
| Statistical Analysis | 12 |
| Analysis of Variance | 9 |
| Comparative Analysis | 8 |
| Research Methodology | 7 |
| Correlation | 6 |
| Mathematical Models | 6 |
| Research Design | 6 |
| Computer Programs | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational and Psychological… | 2 |
| Journal of Educational… | 2 |
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
| Multivariate Behavioral… | 2 |
| Psychometrika | 2 |
| Evaluation Review | 1 |
| ProQuest LLC | 1 |
| Psicologica: International… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 15 |
| Journal Articles | 8 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 7 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Solanas, Antonio; Manolov, Rumen; Sierra, Vicenta – Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 2010
In the first part of the study, nine estimators of the first-order autoregressive parameter are reviewed and a new estimator is proposed. The relationships and discrepancies between the estimators are discussed in order to achieve a clear differentiation. In the second part of the study, the precision in the estimation of autocorrelation is…
Descriptors: Computation, Hypothesis Testing, Correlation, Monte Carlo Methods
McGuire, Michael Patrick – ProQuest LLC, 2010
Spatial or temporal data mining tasks are performed in the context of the relevant space, defined by a spatial neighborhood, and the relevant time period, defined by a specific time interval. Furthermore, when mining large spatio-temporal datasets, interesting patterns typically emerge where the dataset is most dynamic. This dissertation is…
Descriptors: Intervals, Research Methodology, Hypothesis Testing, Statistical Significance
Newman, Isadore; Fraas, John W.; Herbert, Alan – 2001
Statistical significance and practical significance can be considered jointly through the use of non-nil null hypotheses that are based on values deemed to be practically significant. When examining differences between the means of two groups, researchers can use a randomization test or an independent t test. The issue addressed in this paper is…
Descriptors: Groups, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewedSteiger, James H.; Browne, Michael W. – Psychometrika, 1984
A general procedure is provided for comparing correlation coefficients between optimal linear composites. It allows computationally efficient significance tests on independent or dependent multiple correlations, partial correlations, and canonical correlations, with or without the assumption of multivariate normality. Evidence from Monte Carlo…
Descriptors: Correlation, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Statistical Distributions
Peer reviewedRenner, Barbara Rochen; Ball, Donald W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
To determine the effect of violating the assumption of homogeneity of covariance for the Tukey Wholly Significant Difference (WSD) test, Monte Carlo simulations varied the number of treatment groups, sample size, and degree of covariance heterogeneity. As covariance heterogeneity was increased, the empirical significance levels increased beyond…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Research Methodology
Klockars, Alan J.; Hancock, Gregory R. – 1990
Two strategies, derived from J. P. Schaffer (1986), were compared as tests of significance for a complete set of planned orthogonal contrasts. The procedures both maintain an experimentwise error rate at or below alpha, but differ in the manner in which they test the contrast with the largest observed difference. One approach proceeds directly to…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedMendoza, Jorge L.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1974
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Research Design
Halperin, Silas – 1976
There are good reasons for the growing popularity of Monte Carlo procedures; but with increasing use comes increasing misuse. A variety of exact and approximate alternatives should be considered before one chooses to approach a problem with Monte Carlo methods. Once it has been decided that simulation is desirable, consideration should be given to…
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Research Methodology
Meredith, Colin – 1979
The problem of determing how many significant discriminant functions are present in a given data set for a one-way, fixed-effects multivariate analysis of variance design is studied using a Monte Carlo procedure. A variety of procedures, including the popular partitioned-U procedure, are compared with respect to their Type I error rates and power…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Research Reports
Peer reviewedWilson, Gale A.; Martin, Samuel A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
Either Bartlett's chi-square test of sphericity or Steiger's chi-square test can be used to test the significance of a correlation matrix to determine the appropriateness of factor analysis. They were evaluated using computer-generated correlation matrices. Steiger's test is recommended due to its increased power and computational simplicity.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Factor Analysis, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewedLevy, Kenneth J. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1978
Monte Carlo techniques were employed to compare the familiar F-test with Welch's V-test procedure for testing hypotheses concerning a priori contrasts among K treatments. The two procedures were compared under homogeneous and heterogeneous variance conditions. (Author)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewedMiller, John K. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1975
Descriptors: Correlation, Goodness of Fit, Hypothesis Testing, Matrices
Peer reviewedHuynh, Huynh; Feldt, Leonard S. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1976
When the variance assumptions of a repeated measures ANOVA are not met, the F distribution of the mean square ratio should be adjusted by the sample estimate of the Box correction factor. An alternative is proposed which is shown by Monte Carlo methods to be less biased for a moderately large factor. (RC)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing, Matrices
Hoedt, Kenneth C.; And Others – 1984
Using a Monte Carlo approach, comparison was made between traditional procedures and a multiple linear regression approach to test for differences between values of r sub 1 and r sub 2 when sample data were dependent and independent. For independent sample data, results from a z-test were compared to results from using multiple linear regression.…
Descriptors: Correlation, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Multiple Regression Analysis
Peer reviewedGames, Paul A.; Howell, John F. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1976
Compares three methods of analyzing pairwise treatment differences in a multi-treatment experiment via computer simulation techniques. Under the equal n condition, the robustness of the conventional Tukey Wholly Significant Difference test (WSD) to heterogeneous variances was contrasted with two alternate techniques. Under unequal n conditions,…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
