Descriptor
Source
Evaluation Review | 2 |
Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
Olejnik, Stephen F. | 10 |
Algina, James | 7 |
Porter, Andrew C. | 2 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 10 |
Journal Articles | 6 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 3 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Olejnik, Stephen F.; Porter, Andrew C. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1981
The evaluation of competing analysis strategies based on estimator bias and variance is demonstrated using gains in standard scores and analysis of covariance procedures for quasi-experiments conforming to the fan-spread hypothesis. The findings do not lead to a uniform recommendation of either approach. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Bias, Data Analysis, Evaluation, Hypothesis Testing
Olejnik, Stephen F.; Algina, James – 1985
The present investigation developed power curves for two parametric and two nonparametric procedures for testing the equality of population variances. Both normal and non-normal distributions were considered for the two group design with equal and unequal sample frequencies. The results indicated that when population distributions differed only in…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Hypothesis Testing, Power (Statistics), Sampling

Algina, James; Olejnik, Stephen F. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
The Welch-James procedure may be used to test hypothesis on means, when independent samples from populations with heterogenous variances are available. Summation formulas for the Welch-James procedure are presented for the 2x2 design. Matrix formulas that permit routine application of the procedure to crossed factorial designs are presented.…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Mathematical Formulas, Matrices

Olejnik, Stephen F.; Algina, James – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1984
Using computer simulation, parametric analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was compared to ANCOVA with data transformed using ranks, in terms of proportion of Type I errors and statistical power. Results indicated that parametric ANCOVA was robust to violations of either normality or homoscedasticity, but practiced significant power differences favored…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Computer Simulation, Hypothesis Testing, Nonparametric Statistics

Olejnik, Stephen F. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1984
This paper discusses the sample size problem and four factors affecting its solution: significance level, statistical power, analysis procedure, and effect size. The interrelationship between these factors is discussed and demonstrated by calculating minimal sample size requirements for a variety of research conditions. (Author)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design

Algina, James; Olejnik, Stephen F. – Evaluation Review, 1982
A method is presented for analyzing data collected in a multiple group time-series design. This consists of testing linear hypotheses about the experimental and control group-means. Both a multivariate and a univariate procedure are described. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Control Groups, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Experimental Groups

Olejnik, Stephen F.; Algina, James – 1984
Five distribution-free alternatives to parametric analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) are presented and demonstrated using a specific data example. The procedures considered are those suggested by Quade (1967); Puri and Sen (1969); McSweeney and Porter (1971); Burnett and Barr (1978); and Shirley (1981). The results of simulation studies investigating…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Mathematical Formulas

Olejnik, Stephen F.; Algina, James – Evaluation Review, 1985
Five distribution-free alternatives to parametric analysis of covariance are presented and demonstrated: Quade's distribution-free test, Puri and Sen's solution, McSweeney and Porter's rank transformation, Burnett and Barr's rank difference scores, and Shirley's general linear model solution. The results of simulation studies regarding Type I…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods

Olejnik, Stephen F.; Algina, James – 1985
This paper examined the rank transformation approach to analysis of variance as a solution to the Behrens-Fisher problem. Using simulation methodology four parameters were manipulated for the two group design: (1) ratio of population variances; (2) distribution form; (3) sample size and (4) population mean difference. The results indicated that…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Computer Simulation, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing
Olejnik, Stephen F.; Porter, Andrew C. – 1978
The statistical properties of two methods of estimating gain scores for groups in quasi-experiments are compared: (1) gains in scores standardized separately for each group; and (2) analysis of covariance with estimated true pretest scores. The fan spread hypothesis is assumed for groups but not necessarily assumed for members of the groups.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance