NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pejman Ghasemi Poor Sabet; Shen Zhan; Milad Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh – Education Research and Perspectives, 2024
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming multiple facets of the competitive business world and education. Despite this, the full potential of AI applications within education remains unclear because of the lack of a comprehensive framework on how to use AI in developing assessments across various academic disciplines. While incorporating AI…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Test Construction, Engineering Education, Technology Uses in Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Miranda de Hei; Inge Audenaerde – Higher Education Studies, 2023
In this study, we regard co-creation as a collaborative process where students, lecturers and working field professionals from outside the university jointly develop innovative products, processes or knowledge. In co-creation all stakeholders equally contribute to the collaborative process and aim to create beneficial outcomes for each…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Partnerships in Education, Cooperative Learning, Questionnaires
Bachelor, Barry; And Others – 1980
Verbal responses to several tests of originality were subjectively rated for originality. The ratings were compared with the statistical frequency of these responses in two samples of test takers, 150 elementary school children and 60 college students. The elementary school children were administered three measures from the Wallach and Kogar test…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Elementary Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hocevar, Dennis – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979
Three of Guilford's tests of divergent thinking were scored for ideational fluency and originality. The originality scores were reliable, but when the effects of ideational fluency were partialed out of the originality scores, all reliabilities showed substantial decrements; interest correlations dropped to zero or showed a substantial decrement.…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Divergent Thinking, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hocevar, Dennis; Michael, William B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
Two multitrait-multimethod studies were conducted to investigate the effects of two scoring formulas. The study demonstrates that tests of divergent thinking lack discriminant validity when scored in the usual manner. A percentage formula did enhance discriminant validity when originality ratings were subjectively determined. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Divergent Thinking, Grade 5
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Guastello, Stephen J.; And Others – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1992
The validity of 6 indices of divergent production was examined in relation to creative output by 144 undergraduates in 8 domains: visual arts, music, literature, theater, science and engineering, business, apparel design, and video and photographic work. Semantic fluency, ideational fluency, originality, and remote consequences correlated with…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Processes, College Students, Creativity
Hocevar, Dennis – 1979
To compile a list of activities and achievements considered as creative by laymen, 239 graduate and undergraduate students named their three most creative accomplishments and activities in each of six areas: mathematics and science; music; fine arts; performing arts; literature; and miscellaneous. This resulted in a 198-item list, which was rated…
Descriptors: Achievement, Creative Activities, Creativity, Creativity Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Eichenberger, Rudolph J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
The reliability and validity of the Judging Criteria Instrument as a measure of creativity in physics is examined. The instrument was found to be both reliable and valid. (JKS)
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Willhoft, Joseph L.; Lissitz, Robert W. – 1982
The sensitivity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking with regard to an experimenter-induced response set was investigated. One hundred and ninety-eight subjects were divided into four groups. Before performing the Unusual Uses Activity (Verbal Form A), each group was given a unique set of instructions. Group I received standard instructions…
Descriptors: Constructed Response, Creativity Research, Creativity Tests, Discriminant Analysis
Eichenberger, Rudolph J. – 1972
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument to assess the creativity of a student through the products he creates. The instrument was called the Judging Criteria Instrument (JCI). This instrument was administered to 33 general physics students. Multiple criteria of teacher judgment scores and Torrance Tests of Creative…
Descriptors: College Science, Creativity, Creativity Tests, Doctoral Dissertations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goldsmith, Ronald E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986
Four scales of innovativeness were administered to two samples of undergraduate students: the Open Processing Scale, Innovativeness Scale, innovation subscale of the Jackson Personality Inventory, and Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Intercorrelations indicated the scales generally exhibited convergent validity. (GDC)
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Correlation, Creativity Tests, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dailey, David P. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Items constructed like those of Mednick's Remote Associates Test (RAT) fall into distinct categories, which are shown to interact significantly with subjects and with subject groups determined on the basis of performance. Some doubts are cast on the validity of the RAT. A similar 16-item test is included. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Association Measures, Creativity Tests, Higher Education, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weldhen, Margaret – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1981
Despite the amount of work done in evaluation in the humanities, there has not been enough clarification of the kind of knowledge or experience that the humanities can yield. More of this clarification must be done before developing even more new evaluation techniques. (MSE)
Descriptors: Aesthetic Education, Creativity, Higher Education, Humanities Instruction
Welsh, D. Kent – 1979
Since imagery is a unidimensional variable, all measures of imagery, both questionnaires and behavioral, should be correlated; this, however, has not been supported by earlier research. Therefore, a new questionnaire on mental imagery--the Differential Imagery Questionnaire (DIQ)--was developed which taps four types of imagery: word imagery (WI);…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Correlation, Creativity, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sampson, Demetrios G., Ed.; Ifenthaler, Dirk, Ed.; Isaías, Pedro, Ed. – International Association for Development of the Information Society, 2018
The aim of the 2018 International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA) conference was to address the main issues concerned with evolving learning processes and supporting pedagogies and applications in the digital age. There have been advances in both cognitive…
Descriptors: Learning Processes, Teaching Methods, Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2