NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 25 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cross, Lawrence H.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1980
Use of choice-weighted scores as a basis for assigning grades in college courses was investigated. Reliability and validity indices offer little to recommend either type of choice-weighted scoring over number-right scoring. The potential for choice-weighted scoring to enhance the teaching/testing process is discussed. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Credit Courses, Grading, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reid, Frank J. – Journal of Economic Education, 1976
Examines the conventional scoring formula for multiple-choice tests and proposes an alternative scoring formula which takes into account the situation in which the student does not know the right answer but is able to eliminate one or more of the incorrect alternatives. (Author/AV)
Descriptors: Economics Education, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mitchelmore, M. C. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
This paper presents a scientific rationale for deciding the number of points to use on a grading scale in any given assessment situation. The rationale is applied to two common methods of assessment (multiple-choice and essay tests) and an example of a composite assessment. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Essay Tests, Grading, Higher Education
Cross, Lawrence H.; And Others – 1980
A new scoring procedure for multiple choice tests attempts to assess partial knowledge and to restrict guessing. It is a variant of Coombs' elimination scoring method, adapted for use with the carbon-shield answer sheets commonly used with answer-until-correct scoring. Examinees are directed to erase the carbon shields of choices they are certain…
Descriptors: Answer Sheets, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Essex, Diane L. – Journal of Medical Education, 1976
Two multiple-choice scoring schemes--a partial credit scheme and a dichotomous approach--were compared analyzing means, variances, and reliabilities on alternate measures and student reactions. Students preferred the partial-credit approach, which is recommended if rewarding for partial knowledge is an important concern. (Editor/JT)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Medical Students, Multiple Choice Tests, Reliability
Atkinson, George F.; Doadt, Edward – Assessment in Higher Education, 1980
Some perceived difficulties with conventional multiple choice tests are mentioned, and a modified form of examination is proposed. It uses a computer program to award partial marks for partially correct answers, full marks for correct answers, and check for widespread misunderstanding of an item or subject. (MSE)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Frary, Robert B.; And Others – 1985
Students in an introductory college course (n=275) responded to equivalent 20-item halves of a test under number-right and formula-scoring instructions. Formula scores of those who omitted items overaged about one point lower than their comparable (formula adjusted) scores on the test half administered under number-right instructions. In contrast,…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Questionnaires
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gross, Leon J. – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1982
Despite the 50 percent probability of a correctly guessed response, a multiple true-false examination should provide sufficient score variability for adequate discrimination without formula scoring. This scoring system directs examinees to respond to each item, with their scores based simply on the number of correct responses. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Guessing (Tests), Health Education, Higher Education
Tollefson, Nona; Chung, Jing-Mei – 1986
Procedures for correcting for guessing and for assessing partial knowledge (correction-for-guessing, three-decision scoring, elimination/inclusion scoring, and confidence or probabilistic scoring) are discussed. Mean scores and internal consistency reliability estimates were compared across three administration and scoring procedures for…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Graduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bradbard, David A.; Green, Samuel B. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1986
The effectiveness of the Coombs elimination procedure was evaluated with 29 college students enrolled in a statistics course. Five multiple-choice tests were employed and scored using the Coombs procedure. Results suggest that the Coombs procedure decreased guessing, and this effect increased over the grading period. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, College Students, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education
Rand, Earl – 1978
A project is described that was undertaken to investigate: (1) how long a cloze test has to be to achieve optimum reliability without wasting anyone's time; and (2) how cloze tests should be scored in order to obtain maximum reliability. The literature recommended 50 deletions in order to provide for an adequate sample of examinee's abilities; it…
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, English (Second Language), Higher Education, Language Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Poizner, Sharon B.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Binary, probability, and ordinal scoring procedures for multiple-choice items were examined. In two situations, it was found that both the probability and ordinal scoring systems were more reliable than the binary scoring method. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Plake, Barbara S.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1981
Number right and elimination scores were analyzed on a college level mathematics exam assembled from pretest data. Anxiety measures were administered along with the experimental forms to undergraduates. Results suggest that neither test scores nor attitudes are influenced by item order knowledge thereof, or anxiety level. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Plake, Barbara S.; And Others – 1980
Number right and elimination scores were analyzed on a 48-item college level mathematics test that was assembled from pretest data in three forms by varying the item orderings: easy-hard, uniform, or random. Half of the forms contained information explaining the item arrangement and suggesting strategies for taking the test. Several anxiety…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Quantitative Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hsu, Tse-Chi; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1984
The indices of item difficulty and discrimination, the coefficients of effective length, and the average item information for both single- and multiple-answer items using six different scoring formulas were computed and compared. These formulas vary in terms of the assignment of partial credit and the correction for guessing. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Guessing (Tests)
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2