Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Program Effectiveness | 3 |
| Talent Development | 3 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Access to Education | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Achievement Gap | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Budgets | 1 |
| College Instruction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Corwith, Susan | 1 |
| Halpern, Diane F. | 1 |
| Kemper, James E. | 1 |
| Olszewski-Kubilius, Paula | 1 |
| Schanie, Charles F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Olszewski-Kubilius, Paula; Corwith, Susan – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2018
In this article, we review research on poverty, both poverty rates and the effects of poverty on academic achievement more generally and on the identification and services for low-income gifted children specifically. This review sets the stage for further discussion of the research findings on identification practices including the efficacy of…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Poverty, Academic Achievement, Academically Gifted
Schanie, Charles F.; Kemper, James E. – CUPA-HR Journal, 2008
Most "performance evaluation" or "performance development" programs in higher education today are little more than metrically-weak, bureaucratic programs aimed simply at establishing a legally-grounded employee record and a rough basis for merit increases. This article outlines the rationale and procedural framework for a talent development and…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Talent Development, Higher Education, Guidelines
Halpern, Diane F. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1987
With student outcomes assessment, institutions can refocus priorities so that educational quality is based on what and how much students learn. Value-added/talent development and outcomes measures, and models of student outcomes assessment (program improvement, gatekeeping functions, and budget decisions and accountability) are discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Accountability, Budgets, College Instruction, Educational Assessment

Direct link
Peer reviewed
