Descriptor
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Generalizability Theory | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 1 |
| Training | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Fehrmann, Melinda L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedFehrmann, Melinda L.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1991
Two frame-of-reference rater training approaches were compared for effects on reliability and accuracy of cutoff scores generated by 21 raters using Angoff methods on tests taken by 155 undergraduates. Both approaches result in higher interrater reliability and more accuracy than does a non-frame-of-reference method. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluators, Generalizability Theory, Higher Education
