Descriptor
Author
| Bell, Laura C. | 1 |
| Chafe, Wallace | 1 |
| Conrad, Linda | 1 |
| Gitomer, Drew H. | 1 |
| Hyona, Jukka | 1 |
| Judd, Joel B. | 1 |
| Perfetti, Charles A. | 1 |
| Stabler, Edward P., Jr. | 1 |
| Tommola, Jorma | 1 |
| Weiping, Wu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Sentence Completion Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGitomer, Drew H.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987
Processing of verbal analogies was evaluated by recording eye fixation patterns during solution of problems that represented a broad range of difficulty. Findings on easier problems replicated previous work. On difficult items, high verbal ability individuals adapted processing strategies to a greater extent then did low ability students.…
Descriptors: Analogy, Difficulty Level, Eye Fixations, Higher Education
Chafe, Wallace – 1990
Ease of language processing varies with the nature of the language involved. Ordinary spoken language is the easiest kind to produce and understand, while writing is a relatively new development. On thoughtful inspection, the readability of writing has shown itself to be a complex topic requiring insights from many academic disciplines and…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Language Processing
Peer reviewedBell, Laura C.; Perfetti, Charles A. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1994
Highly skilled and less skilled college readers (n=29) were compared on several information-processing and language-comprehension tasks that tap cognitive components of reading. Results confirm that both areas distinguish skilled and less skilled readers and suggest that reading ability is a continuous function. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Processes, College Students, Comparative Analysis
Weiping, Wu – 1993
A "dynamic priority" theory of Chinese second language instruction is outlined and discussed. The theory focuses on five aspects of language instruction: spoken vs. written language; universality vs. particularity; cultural vs. linguistic tasks; performance vs. competence; and proficiency vs. achievement. A dynamic relationship is seen between the…
Descriptors: Chinese, Course Content, Curriculum Design, Difficulty Level
Stabler, Edward P., Jr. – 1986
A type of item used frequently in standardized testing involves the recognition of a sentence. Examples of such items are the sentence completion items, used in both the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and the Graduate Record Examination (GRE), and the sentence correction items used in the Test of Standard Written English. Tests that contain such…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Language Processing, Linguistic Difficulty (Inherent)
Judd, Joel B. – 1988
A study examined the effects of formal and informal learning environments on the storage and recall of lexical items in the first and second languages, paying specific attention to laterality and accuracy rates for tasks of varying difficulty. The study used the dichotic listening task and subjects whose first language was English and whose second…
Descriptors: Brain Hemisphere Functions, College Students, Difficulty Level, Educational Environment
Tommola, Jorma; Hyona, Jukka – 1990
This study investigated the sensitivity of the pupillary response as an indicator of average mental load during three language processing tasks of varying complexity. The tasks included: (1) listening (without any subsequent comprehension testing); (2) speech shadowing (repeating a message in the same language while listening to it); and (3)…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Difficulty Level, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewedConrad, Linda – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1989
A study used compressed speech to observe aural processing strategy differences between native English-speakers and high- and medium-level learners of English as a second language. Quantitative and qualitative differences in recall among the three groups were found. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, English (Second Language)


