Descriptor
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Evaluation Problems | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Knowledge Base for Teaching | 2 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Accreditation (Institutions) | 1 |
| Accrediting Agencies | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Curriculum Evaluation | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Educational Philosophy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWebb, Kathie M. – Journal of Educational Thought/Revue de la Pensee Educative, 1995
Presents a critique of the traditional model of teacher evaluation, arguing that the process is based on an objective view of knowledge and does not recognize or value teachers' personal practical knowledge. Uses the author's experiences of being evaluated (positively) for promotion to develop criticisms and arguments. (35 citations) (MAB)
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, Epistemology, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Download full textJohnson, Michael N.; Erion, R. L. – 1991
The revised standards used by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) embody several departures from past standards. One difference is that they oblige units to focus on the knowledge bases pertinent to professional preparation for education. The concept of knowledge bases is explored, and implications for the construct…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Accreditation (Institutions), Accrediting Agencies, Construct Validity
