Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Competition | 3 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Program Proposals | 3 |
| Grants | 2 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Role | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Economic Development | 1 |
| Economic Factors | 1 |
| Educational Policy | 1 |
| Faculty Development | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kristin M. Shuman – ProQuest LLC, 2017
The national need for higher education research has increased over the years with the growth of societal issues. Funding for this research is often acquired through competitive grant proposals due to the lack of internal funding in most universities. The skills required to write the grant are sometimes lacking and represented in current literature…
Descriptors: Program Proposals, Grants, College Faculty, Higher Education
Metcalfe, Amy Scott; Fenwick, Tara – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 2009
With the dissemination of its Innovation Strategy in 2002, the Canadian government further solidified its commitment to a knowledge-based national competitiveness strategy. Through the unfolding of a multi-million dollar Workplace Skills Strategy (WSS) agency, and the launch of two research agencies, the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) and…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Innovation, Discourse Analysis, Program Descriptions
Peer reviewedMiner, Lynn E.; McDonald, Sally – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1981
The procedural changes identified in analyzing the 1979 Marquette University internal grants competition had the positive effect of improving the reliability of the peer review ratings. Improved reliability results in greater confidence in the peer review process on the part of the applicants and the reviewers. (MLW)
Descriptors: Competition, Financial Aid Applicants, Grants, Higher Education

Direct link
