NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kitchener, Karen Strohm; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1993
This study tested the predictions of Fischer's skill theory for Kitchener and King's reflective judgment model. A total of 156 14- to 28-year-old students were tested, utilizing the Reflective Judgement Interview (RJI) and Prototypic Reflective Judgement Interview (PRJI). Subjects scored higher on the PRJI than they did on the RJI. There was a…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Developmental Stages
Sadowski, Cyril J.; And Others – 1988
Many important social judgments involve deciding whether a person is likely to be successful in a particular situation. The literature on stereotypes suggests that there is a differential application of conceptualizations of ability in describing age and sex groups. This study investigated the hypothesis that age and sex stereotypes are associated…
Descriptors: Ability, Age Differences, Competence, Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Murgatroyd, S. J.; Robinson, E. J. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1993
Four studies revealed that (1) children judged a wrongdoer in a story to feel happy; (2) the incidence of happy judgments did not decline with age; (3) the presence of their teacher had an effect on children's judgments; and (4) some children judged the wrongdoer to feel sad rather than scared. (BB)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Age Differences, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stolte, John F. – Journal of Social Psychology, 1996
Reviews two experiments that strongly support dual coding theory. Dual coding theory holds that communicating concretely (tactile, auditory, or visual stimuli) affects evaluative thinking stronger than communicating abstractly through words and numbers. The experiments applied this theory to the realm of age and evaluation. (MJP)
Descriptors: Age Differences, College Students, Communication (Thought Transfer), Decision Making