Descriptor
| Higher Education | 5 |
| Testing Problems | 5 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Rating Scales | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Standardized Tests | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 5 |
Author
| Bassett, James | 1 |
| Davison, Mark L. | 1 |
| Dunham, Trudy C. | 1 |
| Frary, Robert B. | 1 |
| Lam, Tony C. M. | 1 |
| Mills, Craig N. | 1 |
| Roznowski, Mary | 1 |
| Stevens, Joseph J. | 1 |
| Stocking, Martha L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLam, Tony C. M.; Stevens, Joseph J. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Effects of the following three variables on rating scale response were studied: (1) polarization of opinion regarding scale content; (2) intensity of item wording; and (3) psychological width of the scale. Results with 167 college students suggest best ways to balance polarization and item wording regardless of scale width. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Students, Content Analysis, Higher Education, Rating Scales
Peer reviewedRoznowski, Mary; Bassett, James – Applied Measurement in Education, 1992
Current coaching practices used in training test wiseness for analogy items on standardized test batteries were investigated in a 3-group design involving about 100 undergraduates in each condition. The largest improvement came in items in the middle range of difficulty, but overall effects of coaching were important. (SLD)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Standardized Tests, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewedDunham, Trudy C.; Davison, Mark L. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1990
The effects of packing or skewing the response options of a scale on the common measurement problems of leniency and range restriction in instructor ratings were assessed. Results from a sample of 130 undergraduate education students indicate that packing reduced leniency but had no effect on range restriction. (TJH)
Descriptors: Education Majors, Higher Education, Professors, Rating Scales
Peer reviewedFrary, Robert B. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1993
Methods for detecting copying of multiple-choice test responses are reviewed and compared with respect to their effectiveness and the practicality of their application for groups of varying sizes. Reasons why effective detection methods are seldom applied in standardized and classroom testing are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cheating, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedMills, Craig N.; Stocking, Martha L. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1996
Issues that must be addressed in the large-scale application of computerized adaptive testing are explored, including considerations of test design, scoring, test administration, item and item bank development, and other aspects of test construction. Possible solutions and areas in which additional work is needed are identified. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education


