Descriptor
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Philippines | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Inventory of Learning… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBartling, Carl A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
Several measures of reliability and validity were used to compare a shortened and a complete form of the Inventory of Learning Processes. Very similar reliability and validity statistics were produced with the two forms. Surprisingly low, validity coefficients were produced with both inventories. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Concurrent Validity, Correlation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedWatkins, David; Hattie, John – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
Investigations of the Inventory of Learning Processes (ILP) with college freshmen revealed satisfactory internal consistency coefficients for two of the four ILP scales but cast doubt on the factor structure of the inventory. As predictors of grade point average of Australian students, the scales were successful. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Measurement, Factor Structure, Foreign Countries
Gadzella, B. M.; And Others – 1987
The Inventory of Learning Processes (ILP) was developed by Schmeck, Ribich, and Ramanaiah in 1977 as a self-report inventory to assess learning style through a behavioral-oriented approach. The ILP was revised by Schmeck in 1983. The Revised ILP contains six scales: (1) Deep Processing; (2) Elaborative Processing; (3) Shallow Processing; (4)…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style, College Students, Grade Point Average
