Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Audiences | 1 |
| Cancer | 1 |
| Counties | 1 |
| Focus Groups | 1 |
| Health Education | 1 |
| Health Promotion | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| Marketing | 1 |
| Quasiexperimental Design | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Rural Areas | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Health Education & Behavior | 1 |
Author
| Askelson, Natoshia M. | 1 |
| Campo, Shelly | 1 |
| Graaf, Lorrie J. | 1 |
| Losch, Mary | 1 |
| Routsong, Tracy | 1 |
| Smith, Holly | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCampo, Shelly; Askelson, Natoshia M.; Routsong, Tracy; Graaf, Lorrie J.; Losch, Mary; Smith, Holly – Health Education & Behavior, 2008
National health communication campaign developers have ignored rural audiences in campaign development and testing, despite the health disparities that exist for this group. Researchers in a rural Midwestern state tested the appropriateness of CDC's national colorectal cancer screening campaign, Screen for Life. Based on focus groups and a…
Descriptors: Quasiexperimental Design, Health Education, Focus Groups, Cancer
