Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cutting Scores | 2 |
| Error of Measurement | 2 |
| Evaluators | 2 |
| Guidelines | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Standard Setting | 2 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Generalization | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
| Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkClauser, Brian E.; Kane, Michael; Clauser, Jerome C. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2020
An Angoff standard setting study generally yields judgments on a number of items by a number of judges (who may or may not be nested in panels). Variability associated with judges (and possibly panels) contributes error to the resulting cut score. The variability associated with items plays a more complicated role. To the extent that the mean item…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Generalization, Decision Making, Standard Setting
Download full textWudthayagorn, Jirada – LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 2018
The purpose of this study was to map the Chulalongkorn University Test of English Proficiency, or the CU-TEP, to the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) by employing a standard setting methodology. Thirteen experts judged 120 items of the CU-TEP using the Yes/No Angoff technique. The experts decided whether or not a borderline student at…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Rating Scales, English (Second Language), Language Tests
