Descriptor
| Difficulty Level | 8 |
| Guessing (Tests) | 8 |
| Scoring Formulas | 8 |
| Test Items | 5 |
| Item Analysis | 4 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 4 |
| Scores | 3 |
| Test Construction | 3 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 2 |
| Confidence Testing | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Albanese, Mark A. | 1 |
| Donlon, Thomas F. | 1 |
| Fitzpatrick, Anne R. | 1 |
| Frary, Robert B. | 1 |
| Hsu, Tse-Chi | 1 |
| Kingston, Neal M. | 1 |
| Lord, Frederic M. | 1 |
| Rippey, Robert M. | 1 |
| Smith, Richard M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAlbanese, Mark A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1988
Estimates of the effects of use of formula scoring on the individual examinee's score are presented. Results for easy, moderate, and hard tests are examined. Using test characteristics from several studies shows that some examinees would increase scores substantially if they were to answer items omitted under formula directions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Guessing (Tests), Scores, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedFrary, Robert B. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1989
Responses to a 50-item, 4-choice test were simulated for 1,000 examinees under conventional formula-scoring instructions. Based on 192 simulation runs, formula scores and expected formula scores were determined for each examinee allowing and not allowing for inappropriate omissions. (TJH)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Difficulty Level, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedHsu, Tse-Chi; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1984
The indices of item difficulty and discrimination, the coefficients of effective length, and the average item information for both single- and multiple-answer items using six different scoring formulas were computed and compared. These formulas vary in terms of the assignment of partial credit and the correction for guessing. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Guessing (Tests)
Smith, Richard M. – 1982
There have been many attempts to formulate a procedure for extracting information from incorrect responses to multiple choice items, i.e., the assessment of partial knowledge. The results of these attempts can be described as inconsistent at best. It is hypothesized that these inconsistencies arise from three methodological problems: the…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Goodness of Fit, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewedLord, Frederic M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Oriented Programs, Difficulty Level
Donlon, Thomas F.; Fitzpatrick, Anne R. – 1978
On the basis of past research efforts to improve multiple-choice test information through differential weighting of responses to wrong answers (distractors), two statistical indices are developed. Each describes the properties of response distributions across the options of an item. Jaspen's polyserial generalization of the biserial correlation…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Difficulty Level, Guessing (Tests), High Schools
Rippey, Robert M. – 1971
Technical improvements, which may be made in the reliability and validity of tests through confidence scores, are discussed. However, studies indicate that subjects do not handle their confidence uniformly. (MS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Confidence Testing, Correlation, Difficulty Level
Kingston, Neal M. – 1985
Birnbaum's three-parameter logistic item response model was used to study guessing behavior of low ability examinees on the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) General Test, Verbal Measure. GRE scoring procedures had recently changed, from a scoring formula which corrected for guessing, to number-right scoring. The three-parameter theory was used…
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, Analysis of Variance, College Entrance Examinations, Difficulty Level


