Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Growth Models | 8 |
Accountability | 5 |
Computation | 5 |
Reading Achievement | 5 |
Cohort Analysis | 4 |
Comparative Analysis | 4 |
Correlation | 4 |
Disabilities | 4 |
Elementary School Students | 4 |
Language Arts | 4 |
Longitudinal Studies | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
National Center on Assessment… | 8 |
Author
Nese, Joseph F. T. | 6 |
Tindal, Gerald | 6 |
Elliott, Stephen N. | 4 |
Schulte, Ann C. | 4 |
Stevens, Joseph J. | 4 |
Yel, Nedim | 4 |
Anderson, Daniel | 3 |
Farley, Dan | 2 |
Matta, Tyler | 2 |
Saven, Jessica L. | 2 |
Patarapichayatham, Chalie | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 8 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 6 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Oregon | 3 |
Arizona | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
North Carolina End of Course… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schulte, Ann C.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Yel, Nedim; Tindal, Gerald; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2018
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Schulte, Ann C.; Tindal, Gerald; Yel, Nedim; Anderson, Daniel; Matta, Tyler; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2018
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Stevens, Joseph J.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Schulte, Ann C.; Tindal, Gerald; Yel, Nedim; Anderson, Daniel; Matta, Tyler; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2017
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Schulte, Ann C.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Yel, Nedim; Tindal, Gerald; Anderson, Daniel; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2017
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Nese, Joseph F. T. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2013
Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a system of assessment used to screen for students at risk for poor learning. CBM benchmark screening assessments are typically administered to all students in the fall, winter, and spring, and these data are frequently used by researchers to model and perhaps explain within-year growth. Modeling growth with…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Statistical Analysis, Growth Models, Structural Equation Models
Farley, Dan; Saven, Jessica L.; Tindal, Gerald – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2013
Alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) are designed to measure the academic achievement of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities (SWSCDs). AA-AAS present unique measurement challenges because of the inherent need for individualization in item presentation and response, combined with expectations…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Academic Standards, Intellectual Disability, Accountability
Saven, Jessica L.; Farley, Dan; Tindal, Gerald – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2013
Longitudinally modeling the growth of students with significant cognitive disabilities (SWSCDs) on alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) presents many challenges for states. The number of students in Grades 3-8 who remain in a cohort group varies over time, depending on the methods used to construct the…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Academic Achievement, Intellectual Disability, Growth Models
Patarapichayatham, Chalie; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Sáez, Leilani – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2013
The use of oral reading fluency (ORF) as a predominant measurement tool for identifying struggling readers has grown exponentially over the past 30 years. ORF growth using curriculum-based measures (CBM) has also become an important practical and empirical issue influencing the field. Although fluency scores have shown to be reliable predictors of…
Descriptors: Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Curriculum Based Assessment, Scores