NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Posner-Weber, Cheryl – Small Group Behavior, 1987
Discusses the definition and origin of the term "groupthink." Examines three studies on groupthink by John Courtright (1978), Matie Flowers (1977), and Philip Tetlock (1979). Concludes none of the three is superior to another but that it can be learned from all three that group decision making is fraught with danger. (ABL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Group Behavior, Group Unity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mudrack, Peter E. – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Claims that group cohesiveness has proven to be astonishingly difficult to define precisely and consistently, although it remains a critical group-level variable. Notes that some researchers rely on classic definitions while others leave it undefined. Suggests that greater focus on the definitional issue should improve the quality of future…
Descriptors: Definitions, Foreign Countries, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Charles N. – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Used causal modeling procedures to investigate the relationship between cohesion and productivity in 54 recently formed work groups within the framework of a nine-month longitudinal field study. Results support the central role of group acceptance of organizational goals in determining both productivity and cohesion. (Author/ABL)
Descriptors: Employee Attitudes, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Unity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Owen, William Foster – Small Group Behavior, 1985
Metaphorical analysis of small group interactions enables researchers and practitioners to isolate, identify, and intervene with the current social reality of the group. This heuristic study offers one view of the specific meaning structures which account for the development of group cohesiveness. (BL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Group Behavior, Group Unity, Interaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roark, Albert E.; Sharah, Hussein S. – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Investigated the relationship of group cohesiveness to empathy, self-disclosure, acceptance, and trust, and compared three different groups (personal growth, driving under the influence, psychotherapy), with a total of 65 subjects, on measures of cohesiveness. Found all factors correlated significantly with cohesiveness and with one another.…
Descriptors: Empathy, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Unity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Littlepage, Glenn E.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Examined the relationship between group processes and group performance and cohesion in task and social groups using college students (N=160) as subjects. Found results supported the conceptual distinction between cohesion and performance and the importance of processes dealing with both the task and group maintenance. (Author/ABL)
Descriptors: College Students, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Unity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miesing, Paul; Preble, John F. – Small Group Behavior, 1985
The effects of different group processes on team performance is examined using a formative evaluation. A taxonomy of six different decision-making and leadership styles is developed. Cohesion was found to be a significant factor in explaining high performance. (Author/BL)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Unity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davies, Don; Jacobs, Alfred – Small Group Behavior, 1985
To assess the effect of feedback combinations in group interactions, 28 college students participated in a two hour workshop and then completed feedback ratings. Results indicated differences in credibility, desirability, cohesion, and evaluation, with the positive-negative-positive feedback combination being most effective. (BL)
Descriptors: College Students, Credibility, Feedback, Group Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Elias, Frederick G.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Investigated self-disclosure in college students (N=144) who were assigned to groups of four receiving either a self-disclosure or placebo treatment. Found self-disclosure intervention resulted in significantly higher group cohesiveness, commitment to task and productivity; females demonstrated greater cohesiveness and commitment to task than did…
Descriptors: College Students, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Unity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rugel, Robert P. – Small Group Behavior, 1987
Examined acceptance and congruence in four Tavistock groups consisting of college student volunteers (N=30) using scales measuring curative factors, group process, and congruence. Found participants with higher rankings on the group acceptance measures experienced greater degrees of congruence following the group experience. Discusses implications…
Descriptors: College Students, Congruence (Psychology), Group Behavior, Group Experience
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Edney, Julian J.; Bell, Paul A. – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Conducted two studies in which subjects (N=216) faced the dilemma of how to harvest resources from a shared pool when faced with external catastrophies and given opportunities to steal. Results showed that tying the individual's outcome to the rest of the group is good for the group. (LLL)
Descriptors: Altruism, College Students, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics