Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Accounting Education | 1 |
| Active Learning in Higher… | 1 |
| American Journal of Business… | 1 |
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
| Journal of University… | 1 |
| Teaching of Psychology | 1 |
Author
| Bay, Darlene | 1 |
| Benson, Wendi L. | 1 |
| Daly-Olm, Talei | 1 |
| Eastridge, June A. | 1 |
| Harris-Reeves, Brooke | 1 |
| Headrick, Jonathon | 1 |
| Linas Mitchell | 1 |
| Pacharn, Parunchana | 1 |
| R. Scott Tindale | 1 |
| Rayne Bozeman | 1 |
| Robinson, Daniel H. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 6 |
| Postsecondary Education | 6 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Headrick, Jonathon; Harris-Reeves, Brooke; Daly-Olm, Talei – Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2021
Collaborative testing is recognised as an effective assessment approach linked to positive student outcomes including enhanced test performance and reduced assessment anxiety. While collaborative testing approaches appear beneficial to university students in general, it is unclear whether students from different year levels benefit to the same…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Undergraduate Students, Foreign Countries, Student Attitudes
Rayne Bozeman; Robyn K. Mallett; Linas Mitchell; R. Scott Tindale – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2024
Two-phase testing assesses individual performance (phase 1) and then allows collaborative learning within small groups (phase 2). While groups typically outperform individuals, less is known about the social decision schemes that influence member collaboration. In a classroom setting, we compared individual and group performance on a standard test…
Descriptors: Testing, Group Testing, Cooperative Learning, Learning Experience
Eastridge, June A.; Benson, Wendi L. – Teaching of Psychology, 2020
Research on collaborative testing has shown that it decreases test anxiety, increases learning and critical thinking skills, and allows students to practice collaboration and teamwork. However, it has most often been used as a second test following traditional individual testing. This quasi-experimental study compared two models of collaborative…
Descriptors: Group Testing, Models, Statistics, Test Anxiety
Vogler, Jane S.; Robinson, Daniel H. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2016
In two experiments, 90 undergraduates took six tests as part of an educational psychology course. Using a crossover design, students took three tests individually without feedback and then took the same test again, following the process of team-based testing (TBT), in teams in which the members reached consensus for each question and answered…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Group Testing, Teamwork, Educational Psychology
Bay, Darlene; Pacharn, Parunchana – Accounting Education, 2017
Cooperative learning techniques have been found to be quite successful in a variety of learning environments. However, in university-level accounting courses, investigations of the efficacy of cooperative learning pedagogical methods have produced mixed results at best. To continue the search for a cooperative learning method that is effective in…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Group Testing, Accounting, Advanced Courses
Scafe, Marla G. – American Journal of Business Education, 2011
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of group testing as a pedagogical technique to enhance learning in a difficult subject such as statistics. Individual test scores were compared to their group test scores for the same, identical test. A t test was used to compare the scores for 157 randomly selected MBA students enrolled…
Descriptors: Group Testing, Individual Testing, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis

Peer reviewed
Direct link
