Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 4 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 13 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 42 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Landry, Leonard P. | 3 |
| Davis, Larry E. | 2 |
| Falk, Gideon | 2 |
| Fuhriman, Addie | 2 |
| Keyton, Joann | 2 |
| Knowles, Eric S. | 2 |
| Martini, Mary | 2 |
| Adams, Barbara N. | 1 |
| Ahlgren, Andrew | 1 |
| Albertson, L. A. | 1 |
| Allen, William R. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 23 |
| Postsecondary Education | 15 |
| Secondary Education | 6 |
| High Schools | 3 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 5 |
| Japan | 4 |
| Australia | 3 |
| United Kingdom | 3 |
| California | 2 |
| French Polynesia | 2 |
| Germany | 2 |
| India | 2 |
| Indiana | 2 |
| New York | 2 |
| United States | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Barrett Lennard Relationship… | 1 |
| College and University… | 1 |
| Minnesota Multiphasic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedPhillips, K. – Journal of European Industrial Training, 1983
Examines the nature and impact of boundaries and boundary management in interpersonal skills training (IST). States that the management trainer should be aware of the boundaries he is establishing with trainees and colleagues, and the possible consequences, and the boundaries others are establishing and his reactions to them. (NRJ)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interpersonal Competence, Management Development
Peer reviewedCole, Jacquelyn M. – Journal of Extension, 1980
Presents a model of organized advisory councils containing three components: structural knowledge, programing skills, and group process skills. This framework can be used to train advisory council members and improve the effectiveness of extension programs. (SK)
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Extension Education, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewedHeimovics, Richard D.; Zemelman, David – Educational Administration Quarterly, 1978
Findings indicate that interpersonal compatibility in work groups and its relationship to goal achievement is not a unidimensional or unidirectional phenomenon. Rather, compatibility appears inextricably related to other aspects of group problem solving, including the methodology of decision making. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewedTinsley, Howard E. A.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1989
Examined group leadership style using self-report questionnaire of experienced group leaders (N=204) in effort to build on work of Lieberman, Yalom, and Miles (1973). Found no support for factor structure previously reported by Lieberman et al. Results suggest that group leader questionnaire with modifications can tie leader behavior to outcome.…
Descriptors: Counselor Characteristics, Counselor Role, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Dupin-Bryant, Pamela A. – Journal of Applied Research for Business Instruction, 2008
Groups are a fundamental part of the business world. Yet, as companies continue to expand internationally, a major challenge lies in promoting effective communication among employees who work in varying time zones. Global expansion often requires group collaboration through computer systems. Computer-mediated groups lead to different communicative…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Group Structure, Communication Skills, Employees
Civettini, Nicole H. W. – Social Psychology Quarterly, 2007
This paper investigates the effects that different patterns of similarity among group members have on a group's performance on a problem-solving task. I discuss and test hypotheses on the effects of similarity on group performance derived from two literatures: balance theory and research on homophily. In an experiment I found that the relative…
Descriptors: Group Activities, Problem Solving, Productivity, Group Membership
Northway, Mary L. – Educ Res, 1969
Research supported by grants 71 and 103 from the Ontario Mental Health Foundation.
Descriptors: Children, Grade 1, Grade 2, Group Dynamics
Eggleton, Richard Burke – 1972
A search of the literature of librarianship reveals that very little has been written concerning library school student associations. Two questionnaires were designed; one to be sent to the deans or directors of American Library Association accredited library schools; one to be sent to the presidents of student associations at American Library…
Descriptors: Group Activities, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Library Associations
Peer reviewedAhlgren, Andrew; Walberg, Herbert J. – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1978
Using 144 high school physics classes as units of analysis, class means on a battery of 57 variables were factored in three different factor sets. Each set included three main factors which could be identified roughly as achievement, affect, and group structure. Results gave further credibility to Bales' work. (Author/KR)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedTuckman, Bruce W.; Jensen, Mary Ann C. – Group and Organization Studies, 1977
This review examines published research on small-group development done in the last ten years that would constitute an empirical test of Tuckman's hypothesis that groups go through the stages of "forming,""storming,""norming," and "performing." A fifth stage, "adjourning," was added to the…
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction Process Analysis, Models
Peer reviewedKerr, Pamela J.; Gass, Michael A. – Journal of Experiential Education, 1987
Identifies series of predictable stages through which small groups progress: pre-affiliation, power and control, intimacy, differentiation, and separation. Shows application of group development for each area as group passes through various stages. Outlines model for each area summarizing group interaction and instructor roles for each stage. (NEC)
Descriptors: Adventure Education, Experiential Learning, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics
Carzo, Rocco, Jr.; Yanouzas, John N. – Admin Sci Quart, 1969
This laboratory experiment tested a flat organization structure with few levels of administration, against a tall structure to determine their effects on group performance. (LN)
Descriptors: Communication Problems, Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewedGillet, Louis – Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, 1971
Psychological and educational measurement is carried out according to the type of model used and data collected. The H entropy which shows the dispersion of the data can be divided into intragroup and intergroup entropy. Choice of colors, sociometrical choice, and the communications are three situations where this resolution can be applied. (MF)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Educational Research, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Palleschi, Patricia; Heim, Patricia – Training and Development Journal, 1980
Successful team building depends on the presence of four fundamental concepts of group behavior: (1) shared knowledge, vocabulary, and level of sophistication; (2) shared territory; (3) similar status; and (4) shared access to communications networks. (SK)
Descriptors: Behavior Standards, Group Dynamics, Group Status, Group Structure
Peer reviewedRoark, Albert E.; Roark, Anne Borders – Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1979
All groups have the same amount of structure. There are basically six elements of group structure. They are membership, members, and leaders; physical structure, group quarters, and member arrangements; time; activities; norms and interaction patterns; and purposes, goals, and objectives. The article explores these components. (Author/CMG)
Descriptors: Conceptual Schemes, Counseling Theories, Counselors, Group Counseling

Direct link
