Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 8 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 76 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Australia | 10 |
| Canada | 6 |
| California | 4 |
| Sweden | 4 |
| New Zealand | 3 |
| Texas (Austin) | 3 |
| United Kingdom | 3 |
| Denmark | 2 |
| Finland | 2 |
| Germany | 2 |
| Hong Kong | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| First Amendment | 1 |
| School to Work Opportunities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Flanders System of… | 3 |
| Personal Orientation Inventory | 1 |
| Tennessee Self Concept Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSilbergeld, Sam; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
To assess two group models being developed in the Mental Health Study Center, NIMH, this paper compares HIM data from these models with norms from a previous study. By contrasting HIM results from groups of married couples, young adolescents, and parents and teachers, one obtains a better understanding of the effectiveness of these models. (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedGilstein, Kenneth W.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Leadership style significantly affects the quantity and quality of group interaction. The personality of individuals in a group will be related to the amount and type of interaction that an individual emits in a group, to the satisfaction that a person reports about the group, and to his socio-political subculture. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Evaluation Criteria, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedConyne, Robert K.; Rapin, Lynn S. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study compared the effectiveness of facilitator-directed and self-directed personal growth group treatments toward inducing therapeutic verbal interaction. An interaction process analysis approach, the Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM) statement-by-statement system, was used to examine treatment differences. (Author)
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Leadership Styles
Dixon, David N.; Sciara, Anthony D. – Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 1977
This research examined use of reciporcity procedures with married couples in a group format. Couples (N=7), enrolled in a non-credit extension course, participated in an eight-week workshop. Commitment to and optimism about marriage and ratings on three of nine areas of couple interaction significantly increased over the eight-week period. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness, Group Counseling, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedBrowning, Larry D. – Group and Organization Studies, 1977
A framework for diagnosing real groups focuses on group origins and membership differences. This perspective is offered as an aid to interpreting communication behavior of groups in organizational settings. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Cooperative Planning, Group Dynamics, Group Membership
Peer reviewedAlderton, Steven M.; Frey, Lawrence R. – Central States Speech Journal, 1983
Investigated how majority and minority arguments are positively or negatively responded to by group members and the effects of such responses on the polarization process. Demonstrated that reactions to minority arguments, not the forwarding of minority arguments per se, were significantly correlated with the degree of group polarization. (PD)
Descriptors: College Students, Communication Research, Decision Making, Group Discussion
Peer reviewedLakin, Martin; And Others – International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 1984
Analyzed 10 interaction dimensions of group behavior and three emotional atmosphere categories among old and young participants in 12 "support-discussion" groups. Results showed significant differences with respect to frequencies of boundary, self-disclosure, and support behaviors. In addition, the young showed signs of boredom more frequently.…
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Age Differences, College Students, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedHartley, Dianna; And Others – American Psychologist, 1976
This article focuses on (a) the types and incidence of casualties reported for encounter groups; (b) participant, group, and leader variables associated with negative outcome, (c) procedures for minimizing casualties, and (d) research considerations. (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Emotional Problems, Failure, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy
Dobbs, Ralph C.; Fitchett, Lee – Agricultural Education Magazine, 1973
Descriptors: Adult Education, Adult Educators, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedGilmore, S. – Educational Review, 1973
The aim of this study was to observe the dynamics of a socio-psychological process, namely, cohesiveness, occurring among seven-year old pupils organised in groups of five engaged in an improvised drama activity. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Drama, Educational Research, Elementary School Students, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedDawes, Robyn M.; And Others – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Attitudes, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedGuttentag, Marcia; Wheeler, Gloria – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, College Students, Decision Making, Environmental Influences
Peer reviewedHorn, B. Ray – Journal of Environmental Education, 1971
Descriptors: Behavioral Sciences, Communication (Thought Transfer), Decision Making, Environmental Education
Danish, Steven J.; Zelenski, Joseph F. – Journal of College Student Personnel, 1972
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Communication Skills, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Joure, Sylvia A.; And Others – Training and Development Journal, 1971
Report focuses on some over-uses of sensitivity training by showing that the technique is differentially effective for separate groups of people. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence


