NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)3
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Parker, John N.; Cardenas, Edgar; Dorr, Alexander N.; Hackett, Edward J. – Sociological Methods & Research, 2020
New technologies transform research specialties and potentiate new fields. Sociometers--wearable electronic sensors collecting quantitative, dynamic data about embodied social interactions at hyperfine scales--represent such a possibility for small group research. This article introduces this new method and its distinctive qualities and…
Descriptors: Measurement Equipment, Data Collection, Group Structure, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Franz, Nancy K. – Qualitative Report, 2011
Facilitating successful focus groups requires both science and art. One element that can fully challenge focus group facilitators includes how to handle the unfocused focus group. This article describes "unfocus" and the benefits and disadvantages of unfocus in focus groups. Lessons learned from and approaches taken on this journey are shared to…
Descriptors: Focus Groups, Attention, Difficulty Level, Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lindsay, D. Michael – Social Forces, 2010
Formal organizations share a common set of characteristics that include identifiable operating principles and coordinating mechanisms as well as lines of authority and communication. However, some organizations--especially those on the margins of institutional fields--creatively combine institutional and anti-institutional characteristics. This…
Descriptors: Religious Organizations, Institutional Characteristics, Organizational Effectiveness, Organizational Culture
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mayhew, Bruce H.; Levinger, Roger L. – American Journal of Sociology, 1976
This study examines how group size affects power structure. Elementary conditions under which human interaction generally occurs constrain power to equalize as the length of the interaction sequence increases and to polarize as the size of the group increases. (Author/DE)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction Process Analysis, Power Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cunningham, P. G.; Parker, A. J. – Sociology and Social Research, 1978
Based upon research conducted aboard a ship, this article substantiates the hypothesis that whether or not homosexuality is excused will depend upon the compatibility of such tolerance with the prevailing terms being used to rationalize the experience of differential power. (Author/JC)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Homosexuality, Interaction Process Analysis
Wood, Michael T. – 1971
This dissertation address concerns the distribution of influence in decision-making groups. One general hypothesis of the study was that influence perceptions of group members depend upon the phases of decision-making in which they participate. Another was that the effects of participation would vary with the nature of the decision task or with…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Parcel, Toby L.; Cook, Karen S. – Sociometry, 1977
The relationship between a group's power and prestige or status hierarchy and group members' patterns of reward allocation was investigated. The addition of evidence concerning actual task performance results in the alignment of reward and status rankings and encourages the use of distribution rules stressing equity as opposed to equality.…
Descriptors: Ability, Females, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stein, Timothy R.; And Others – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973
The research reported in this article examines the accuracy of outside observers in perceiving emergent leadership in small groups. The level of precision reflected in the average of all subjects, indicated that the observers were generally accurate in knowing how group members were rated by their group. (Author/KM)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Status, Group Structure, Leadership Qualities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Falk, Gideon – Small Group Behavior, 1981
Uses a laboratory experiment involving role-playing groups to show that an assigned majority rule is likely to lead to higher-quality solutions than unanimity and no-decision rule. Results indicated under majority rule workers resistance to the foreman's power often resulted in a successful search for a better solution. (JAC)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Demange, Gabrielle – Journal of Political Economy, 2004
A hierarchical structure is a widespread organizational form in many areas. My aim in this paper is to provide a rationale for this fact based on two premises. First, a group organizes itself so as to achieve efficient coordination. Second, efficient coordination is achieved only if subgroups as well as individuals agree to cooperate. Even in…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Group Dynamics, Decision Making, Efficiency
Zimet, Carl N.; Schneider, Carol – J Soc Psychol, 1969
Sponsored by National Institute of Mental Health grant MH-08274.
Descriptors: Discussion Groups, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Falk, Gideon; Falk, Shoshana – Group and Organization Studies, 1981
Groups (N=62) of four members each used a multiple role-playing technique under three conditions: majority rule, unanimity rule, or no assigned decision rule. Results suggested that assignment of a majority rule has greater potential for reducing power inequalities. Discusses changes in members' self-perceived power. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Adults, Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barge, J. Kevin – Communication Quarterly, 1989
Examines which leadership model provides a better explanation of the relationship between leadership behavior and group outcomes--the group leadership influence model or the leaderless group discussion model. Discusses implications for group leadership from a leaderless group discussion perspective based on the findings of a laboratory descriptive…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Stech, Ernest L. – 1980
A study of coordination modes in work group communication was conducted to evaluate and expand leadership contingency models. A total of 106 people in classes and workshops on organizational communication completed seven questionnaires resulting in nine measures of six independent variables representing the following contingency factors from…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Communication (Thought Transfer), Contingency Management, Group Dynamics
Kramer, Howard C. – 1982
Aspects of the relationships between state college and university representatives and state coordinating councils, and forms of intragroup behavior are considered. It is suggested that within an interorganizational paradigm, knowledge of and ability in interagency coordination may be crucial to the future of higher education. Higher education is…
Descriptors: Competition, Cooperation, Government School Relationship, Group Dynamics
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2