Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Group Behavior | 63 |
| Group Dynamics | 63 |
| Group Structure | 63 |
| Interaction Process Analysis | 17 |
| Groups | 11 |
| Decision Making | 9 |
| Group Membership | 9 |
| Problem Solving | 9 |
| Foreign Countries | 8 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 8 |
| Leadership | 8 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Knowles, Eric S. | 2 |
| Martini, Mary | 2 |
| Allen, William R. | 1 |
| Anderson, Jeffrey A. | 1 |
| Anderson, Joseph D. | 1 |
| Auvine, Brian | 1 |
| BRIDGES, EDWIN M. | 1 |
| Bennett, Neville | 1 |
| Brownlee, Don | 1 |
| Buttner, Christian | 1 |
| Calhoon, Mary Beth | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dana Kube; Sebastian Gombert; Nathalie John; Joshua Weidlich; Karel Kreijns; Hendrik Drachsler – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Gender and gender diversity are group features affecting social interaction and are critical for gender-inclusive and equitable education. As such, the role of gender and gender diversity is of particular relevance to computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). However, up until now, research on this topic in CSCL remains scarce.…
Descriptors: Sexual Identity, Sex Role, Gender Differences, Gender Issues
Gopinath, C.; Saleem, Farida – Journal of Education for Business, 2020
Team projects are a component of many business courses. The objective is to build team skills in addition to learning subject matter. However, instructors often pay less attention to team design and behavior and assume students already have or will learn team skills on their own. The authors examined the effect of providing structure to team work…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Student Projects
Yoon, Susan; Liu, Lei; Goh, Sao-Ee – Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2010
Understanding the dynamics of individual or group adaptation can provide valuable information for constructing professional development strategies to increase chances of instructional success. This paper reports on an exploratory study that identifies indicators of convergent vs. non-convergent adaptation in two cases of teachers working together…
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Group Dynamics, Adjustment (to Environment), Group Behavior
Peer reviewedHeimovics, Richard D.; Zemelman, David – Educational Administration Quarterly, 1978
Findings indicate that interpersonal compatibility in work groups and its relationship to goal achievement is not a unidimensional or unidirectional phenomenon. Rather, compatibility appears inextricably related to other aspects of group problem solving, including the methodology of decision making. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewedKerr, Pamela J.; Gass, Michael A. – Journal of Experiential Education, 1987
Identifies series of predictable stages through which small groups progress: pre-affiliation, power and control, intimacy, differentiation, and separation. Shows application of group development for each area as group passes through various stages. Outlines model for each area summarizing group interaction and instructor roles for each stage. (NEC)
Descriptors: Adventure Education, Experiential Learning, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics
Knowles, Eric S. – 1970
The stimulus value of group boundaries was investigated in a field experiment. It was hypothesized that the size of a group and the status of its members would reduce the permeability of a boundary around an interacting group. Two or 4 interacting people of high or low status interrupted the traffic flow in a university hallway. Results indicate…
Descriptors: Behavior, Behavior Patterns, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedNyman, Gary W. – Communication Quarterly, 1976
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Conferences, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedMurrell, Audrey J.; And Others – Journal of Business Communication, 1993
Compares decision processes of consensus and devil's advocacy within an additive task, a disjunctive task, and a conjunctive task structure. Finds that high-conflict decision processes such as devil's advocacy enhances decision making in disjunctive tasks, retards decision making in additive tasks, but has no effect on decision making in…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedZiller, R. C. – Human Development, 1977
The concept of group dialectics is considered within a temporal framework. Long-term groups are considered in terms of such temporal concepts as continuity, change, goal direction, attachment and groups in process. A conceptualization of small group dynamics based on time factors is presented. (BD)
Descriptors: Conceptual Schemes, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewedAnderson, Joseph D. – Small Group Behavior, 1985
Eight "myths" about small group processes and outcomes are presented and matched against research and practice. Conclusions are drawn concerning benefits of group experience, group composition, leader impact, role of structural exercises, function of the "here-and-now," self-disclosure and feedback, understanding group processes, and the long-term…
Descriptors: Beliefs, Group Behavior, Group Counseling, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedRunkel, Philip J.; And Others – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
A study was made of small workgroups, each of which was assigned to complete an empirical investigation. These workgroups were observed by students. The framework for the observations was Tuckman's (1965) proposed model of group development. The goal was to test the fit of Tuckman's model to the actual development of the workgroups observed in the…
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Individual Psychology
Kent, R. N.; McGrath, J. E. – J Exp Soc Psychol, 1969
Research supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewedFuehrer, Ann; Keys, Christopher – Small Group Behavior, 1988
Examined applicability of Bednar, Melnick, and Kaul's model of early group development to college student self-help groups using undergraduates (N=101) who met in high-structure or low-structure groups. Found amount of group structure was positively related to ownership of group functioning; importance of performing group behaviors was positively…
Descriptors: College Students, Group Behavior, Group Counseling, Group Dynamics
Kitao, S. Kathleen – 1988
One of the most important differences between American and Japanese cultures is the difference in group interaction. The Japanese have been described as group-oriented and Americans as individualistic. In Japan, groups are hierarchical and usually make decisions by consensus. Japanese groups play an important role in the lives of their members,…
Descriptors: Communication Problems, Cultural Differences, Foreign Countries, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedMaynard, Douglas W. – American Sociological Review, 1985
Conflict episodes among first-graders were videotaped and analyzed. It appears that the function of social conflict among children is to build their small-group society and its structure: while arguing, children create political alignments, and thereby realize their practical interests within a changing set of social relationships. (KH)
Descriptors: Children, Conflict, Elementary Education, Group Behavior

Direct link
