Descriptor
| Employee Attitudes | 2 |
| Group Dynamics | 2 |
| Group Unity | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Attendance | 1 |
| Employer Attitudes | 1 |
| Employer Employee Relationship | 1 |
| Group Behavior | 1 |
| Management Teams | 1 |
| Middle Management | 1 |
| Organizational Development | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGreene, Charles N. – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Used causal modeling procedures to investigate the relationship between cohesion and productivity in 54 recently formed work groups within the framework of a nine-month longitudinal field study. Results support the central role of group acceptance of organizational goals in determining both productivity and cohesion. (Author/ABL)
Descriptors: Employee Attitudes, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Unity
Download full textTang, Thomas Li-Ping; And Others – 1987
Quality circles (QCs) have been considered one of the most promising approaches to improving American workers' productivity. The differences of quality circle effectiveness between active QCs (N=36) and inactive QCs (N=17) in a 3-year period were examined in a quasi-experimental field study. The dependent variables examined were the amount of…
Descriptors: Administrators, Attendance, Employee Attitudes, Employer Attitudes
