Descriptor
| Behavior Patterns | 18 |
| Group Dynamics | 18 |
| Sensitivity Training | 18 |
| Interaction Process Analysis | 6 |
| Trainers | 6 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 5 |
| Group Behavior | 3 |
| Human Relations | 3 |
| Individual Development | 3 |
| Research Projects | 3 |
| Role Perception | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Guides - Classroom - Learner | 2 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLuke, Robert A., Jr. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972
This study attempts to articulate the internal normative structure of sensitivity training groups by identifying the normative patterns that govern member behavior and by examining the relative influence exercised by trainer and member over the establishment and maintenance of group norms. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Group Norms, Group Structure
Peer reviewedLundgren, David C. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
Developmental trends in two 10-man training groups were studied by checklist and rating scale techniques throughout a four-day laboratory. Differences in the developmental patterns of the two T Groups are interpreted as consequences of the contrasting approaches of the trainers. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Groups, Sensitivity Training
Peer reviewedBolman, Lee – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
Among the effects of trainers on their T Groups was that trainer empathy and security were related to liking for the trainer and perceived member learning. Trainer affection, tendencies to reward and punish, and openess showed no or little relationship to participant learning. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Empathy, Group Dynamics, Human Relations
Peer reviewedBiberman, Gerald – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Results of this study reflect changes in the T-group model suggested by authors in the literature. Trainers currently leading groups tend to differ in theoretical orientations. They appear to be running T-groups which frequently have a personal growth and individual orientation, although some still have a primarily group dynamics orientation.…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Counseling Theories, Group Dynamics, Leadership Styles
Peer reviewedWeinstein, Malcolm S.; Hanson, Robert – Small Group Behavior, 1975
This study is an initial report in a research program to examine the nature and influence of one set of structural variables--participation patterns--on patterns of interaction in sensitivity training groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Experience, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedFrankiel, Harry H. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
In the present study, members of two trainer groups did not form relationships which were both mutually therapeutic and confronting so frequently as did members of one trainer groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedFisher, B. Aubrey – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Provides an insight into the group process of therapy and compares and contrasts the T-group process with therapy group process. The here-and-now orientation was present in T-group and therapy-group interaction. Greater relational conflict was present in the T-group. Members of the therapy group were much more defensive than members of the…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Communication (Thought Transfer), Conflict, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedMarks, Michael W.; Vestre, Norris D. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
College students (N=27) were assigned to a time-extended or a marathon group or a control condition to evaluate the effects of encounter experiences on self-perception and interpersonal behavior. Both experimental groups showed significantly greater changes in self-perceptions from pretest to posttest than the control group. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Behavior Patterns, College Students, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedAlderfer, Clayton, P.; Lodahl, Thomas M. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
A comparison between a T-Group course and a more traditional human relations course indicated the following findings: the T-Group course showed more here-and-now behavior, more group dynamics and less organizational dynamics content, more involvement, more perceived transfer of learning, and more percieved comfort with feelings. (Author/BY)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Classroom Research, Graduate Students, Group Dynamics
Thompson, George W. – 1968
Concentrating on theory and practice on sensitivity training groups (T groups) in human relations training laboratories, this study investigates aspects of the process whereby participants are said to learn cooperatively about their group and about themselves as members. As evidenced by training "dilemmas" noted in the literature, relevant T group…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Conflict, Doctoral Dissertations, Feedback
Peer reviewedGoldbart, Stephen; Cooper, Lowell – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Non-task-oriented activities that take place in a therapy group are conceived of as processes geared towards establishing and reassuring safety. The authors take an existentialist Langian approach to safety and discuss the notion that necessarily unresolved perceptions of ontological insecurity act upon members as individuals and as a group. (NG)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Existentialism, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy
Peer reviewedWeigel, Richard G. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This article examines the historical development of marathon encounter groups and provides speculation as to their future use. (YRJ)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Individual Development
Peer reviewedAdelson, Joseph P. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The role of feedback in T-groups was studied. Results indicate that feedback increases as T-groups progress, feedback is more emotional and non-evaluative than cognitive in nature, positive and direct feedback to the leaders increases as the group develops, and specific feedback between members increases as groups progress. (SE)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Feedback, Group Behavior
Gosling, Robert; And Others – 1967
These three British studies illustrate the use of small group methods to impart human relations knowledge and skills to professionals in medical and social services. The first paper deals with general practitioners who meet weekly over extended periods of time for case discussions. The second describes experiences of the Family Discussion Bureau…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Correctional Institutions, Group Dynamics, Human Relations
Gollub, Wendy Leebov; And Others – 1979
The objectives of this workshop module are to help teachers recognize the power of their expectations to influence the behavior and perception of students, to identify commonly held expectations for the sexes and the self-fulfilling consequences of these expectations, and to examine the inappropriateness of differential expectations based on sex.…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Concept Formation, Elementary Secondary Education, Expectation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2

