Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Algebra | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Graphing Calculators | 2 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| College Mathematics | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Governance | 1 |
| Graphs | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Mathematics and Computer… | 1 |
| PRIMUS | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Michigan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMesa, Vilma; Suh, Heejoo; Blake, Tyler; Whittemore, Timothy – PRIMUS, 2012
We present an analysis of several characteristics of examples in 10 college algebra textbooks used in community colleges or 4-year institutions. We analyzed the examples along four dimensions: cognitive demand, the responses expected, the use of representations, and the strategies available for verifying the correctness of the solutions. We found…
Descriptors: Algebra, Textbooks, Problem Solving, Graphing Calculators
Peer reviewedWilliams, Carol G. – Mathematics and Computer Education, 1993
Discusses areas where teachers may harbor mistaken assumptions about their students' understanding when using graphing calculators: (1) confidence and competence with order of operations, (2) integration of algebraic and graphical knowledge, and (3) scaling a graph. (MKR)
Descriptors: Algebra, College Students, Concept Formation, Difficulty Level
