Descriptor
| Goodness of Fit | 3 |
| Matrices | 3 |
| Multivariate Analysis | 3 |
| Analysis of Covariance | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cross Sectional Studies | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Least Squares Statistics | 1 |
| Longitudinal Studies | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLee, Sik-Yum; Tsui, Kwok-Leung – Psychometrika, 1982
The work of Joreskog and Sorbom in comparing factor structures of several populations is extended to a more general analysis of covariance structures. Also, more complex constraints on parameters are allowed in this work. (JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Goodness of Fit, Hypothesis Testing, Least Squares Statistics
Download full textMillsap, Roger E.; And Others – 1986
A constrained component analysis method, which bears a formal resemblance to the confirmatory factor analysis methods developed by K. G. Joreskog (1969) and others, is presented. In confirmatory factor analysis, the constraints allow the testing of formally structural hypotheses within a model that is falsifiable, even in its "just…
Descriptors: Cross Sectional Studies, Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewedStelzl, Ingeborg – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1986
Since computer programs have been available for estimating and testing linear causal models, these models have been used increasingly in the behavioral sciences. This paper discusses the problem that very different causal structures may fit the same set of data equally well. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Correlation, Goodness of Fit, Mathematical Models
