Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
Measurement:… | 6 |
Author
Black, Paul | 1 |
Ceci, Stephen J. | 1 |
Clark, Cameron M. | 1 |
Goghari, Vina M. | 1 |
Hiscock, Merrill | 1 |
Kanaya, Tomoe | 1 |
Lawlor-Savage, Linette | 1 |
Pietschnig, Jakob | 1 |
Williams, Wendy M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 6 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pietschnig, Jakob – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2016
Clark, Lawlor-Savage, and Goghari (this issue) provide an interesting comment on the explanatory framework of generational IQ test score changes over time in the general population (i.e., the Flynn effect). They argue that IQ test score gains are not due to genuine ability increases in the general population but are rather manifestations of…
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Change, Generational Differences, Influences
Black, Paul – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2016
Here Paul Black comments on the paper by Clark in this issue. Black first comments that the Clark paper highlights two possible factors that might effect trends of change over time. The first is that the population has become more adept at dealing with the types of challenges IQ tests present to them. Such explanations must be analyzed in light of…
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Change, Generational Differences, Intelligence Tests
Hiscock, Merrill – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2016
Merrill Hiscock presents two criticisms of Clark's analysis of the Flynn effect. The first is that the authors worry too much about general ability and pay too little attention to multifactorial concepts of intelligence. The second applies not only to the Clark et al. paper but to the Flynn effect literature in general--namely, neglect of the…
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Change, Generational Differences, Ability
Kanaya, Tomoe – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2016
Clark, Lawlor-Savage, and Goghari (this issue) point out that evidence of IQ rises had been documented decades before it was named the Flynn effect. These previous studies, however, were conducted sporadically and in isolated samples. Flynn (1984, 1987) examined them in a large-scale manner and was able to show their systematic and global nature.…
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Change, Generational Differences, Intelligence Tests
Ceci, Stephen J.; Williams, Wendy M. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2016
Clark et al. focus on the likely drivers of the Flynn effect (sociocultural, educational, technological), and imply that it is not a single causal agent driving the upward climb in IQ scores but perhaps multiple causes with different onsets. Given, the authors' conception of intelligence in terms of underlying attentional and cognitive resources…
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Change, Generational Differences, Qualitative Research
Clark, Cameron M.; Lawlor-Savage, Linette; Goghari, Vina M. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2016
Average intelligence quotient (IQ) scores have been rising throughout the 20th century and likely before--a pattern now known as the Flynn effect. The central thesis of this paper is that the Flynn effect does not represent genuine increases in general intelligence but rather an increasing aptitude for the types of modern thinking that modern life…
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Aptitude, Change