Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Scripts | 2 |
| Standards | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| English | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textGill, Tim – Research Matters, 2022
In Comparative Judgement (CJ) exercises, examiners are asked to look at a selection of candidate scripts (with marks removed) and order them in terms of which they believe display the best quality. By including scripts from different examination sessions, the results of these exercises can be used to help with maintaining standards. Results from…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Scripts, Standards
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGreatorex, Jackie; Bell, John F. – Research Papers in Education, 2008
It is particularly important that GCSE and A-level marking is valid and reliable as it affects the life chances of many young people in England. Current developments in marking technology are coinciding with potential changes in procedures to ensure valid and reliable marking. In this research the effectiveness of procedures to facilitate the…
Descriptors: Scripts, Intervention, Interrater Reliability, Examiners
