Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| Probability | 3 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 3 |
| Computation | 2 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Credentials | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 2 |
Author
| Andrich, David | 1 |
| Chis, Liliana | 1 |
| Clauser, Brian E. | 1 |
| Harik, Polina | 1 |
| Heldsinger, Sandra | 1 |
| Humphry, Stephen | 1 |
| Margolis, Melissa J. | 1 |
| McManus, I. C. | 1 |
| Mollon, Jennifer | 1 |
| Williams, Simon | 1 |
| van der Linden, Wim J. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Humphry, Stephen; Heldsinger, Sandra; Andrich, David – Applied Measurement in Education, 2014
One of the best-known methods for setting a benchmark standard on a test is that of Angoff and its modifications. When scored dichotomously, judges estimate the probability that a benchmark student has of answering each item correctly. As in most methods of standard setting, it is assumed implicitly that the unit of the latent scale of the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Standard Setting (Scoring), Judges, Item Response Theory
Clauser, Brian E.; Harik, Polina; Margolis, Melissa J.; McManus, I. C.; Mollon, Jennifer; Chis, Liliana; Williams, Simon – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
Numerous studies have compared the Angoff standard-setting procedure to other standard-setting methods, but relatively few studies have evaluated the procedure based on internal criteria. This study uses a generalizability theory framework to evaluate the stability of the estimated cut score. To provide a measure of internal consistency, this…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Group Discussion, Standard Setting (Scoring), Scoring
van der Linden, Wim J. – 1981
It has often been argued that all techniques of standard setting are arbitrary and likely to yield different results for different techniques or persons. This paper deals with a related but hitherto ignored aspect of standard setting, namely, the possibility that Angoff or Nedelsky judges misspecify the probabilities of the borderline student's…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Evaluators, Foreign Countries, Latent Trait Theory

Peer reviewed
Direct link
