Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 3 |
| Test Length | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Computation | 2 |
| Sample Size | 2 |
| Ability | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Doebler, Anna | 1 |
| Doebler, Philipp | 1 |
| Dogan, Nuri | 1 |
| Holling, Heinz | 1 |
| Kilic, Abdullah Faruk | 1 |
| Seong, Tae-Je | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kilic, Abdullah Faruk; Dogan, Nuri – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2021
Weighted least squares (WLS), weighted least squares mean-and-variance-adjusted (WLSMV), unweighted least squares mean-and-variance-adjusted (ULSMV), maximum likelihood (ML), robust maximum likelihood (MLR) and Bayesian estimation methods were compared in mixed item response type data via Monte Carlo simulation. The percentage of polytomous items,…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Computation, Least Squares Statistics, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Doebler, Anna; Doebler, Philipp; Holling, Heinz – Psychometrika, 2013
The common way to calculate confidence intervals for item response theory models is to assume that the standardized maximum likelihood estimator for the person parameter [theta] is normally distributed. However, this approximation is often inadequate for short and medium test lengths. As a result, the coverage probabilities fall below the given…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Item Response Theory, Computation, Hypothesis Testing
Seong, Tae-Je; And Others – 1997
This study was designed to compare the accuracy of three commonly used ability estimation procedures under the graded response model. The three methods, maximum likelihood (ML), expected a posteriori (EAP), and maximum a posteriori (MAP), were compared using a recovery study design for two sample sizes, two underlying ability distributions, and…
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Estimation (Mathematics)

Peer reviewed
Direct link
