Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Familiarity | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Librarian Attitudes | 2 |
| Academic Libraries | 1 |
| Change Strategies | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Humanities | 1 |
| Influence of Technology | 1 |
| Knowledge Level | 1 |
| Liberal Arts | 1 |
| Library Automation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Holmberg, Kim | 1 |
| Huvila, Isto | 1 |
| Kronqvist-Berg, Maria | 1 |
| Metz, Paul | 1 |
| Nivakoski, Outi | 1 |
| Stemmer, John | 1 |
| Widén, Gunilla | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Finland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkHuvila, Isto; Holmberg, Kim; Kronqvist-Berg, Maria; Nivakoski, Outi; Widén, Gunilla – Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2013
Library 2.0 is a change in the way libraries interact with their users. Technological developments on the Web have had a major influence on these changes. The change also places new requirements on librarians' competencies and skills. This research investigates how librarians themselves see this change in terms of their work identity and working…
Descriptors: Library Automation, Library Development, Library Services, Library Research
Peer reviewedMetz, Paul; Stemmer, John – College & Research Libraries, 1996
Analysis of a survey, completed by 128 collection development librarians at 72 liberal arts colleges, ranked six university presses and 58 publishers associated with science and technology, humanities, and social sciences by their perceptions of familiarity, quality and academic relevance. Found that university presses are well respected:…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Comparative Analysis, Familiarity, Foreign Countries
