Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Readability | 2 |
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Audits (Verification) | 1 |
| Behavior Problems | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| English | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Malaysia | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWardale, Simon; Davis, Fiona; Vassos, Maria; Nankervis, Karen – Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 2018
Background: Quality behaviour support plans (BSPs) are critical for achieving positive outcomes for people with intellectual disability who exhibit challenging behaviour. This study measured the quality of BSPs for technical accuracy and appropriate readability. Method: Ten disability support organisations provided 139 BSPs for evaluation using…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Positive Behavior Supports, Program Evaluation, Audits (Verification)
Download full textJanan, Dahlia; Wray, David – Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 2014
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to review readability formulae and offer a critique, based on a comparison of the grading of a variety of texts given by six well-known formulae. Methodology: A total of 64 texts in English were selected either by or for native English speaking children aged between six and 11 years. Each text was assessed…
Descriptors: Readability Formulas, Readability, Accuracy, Word Frequency
