NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 33 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Aranzazu Bea Reyes; Carmen Rodríguez-Gonzalo – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
The importance of revision has been recognised by numerous scholars of the teaching and learning of writing (Abad & Rodríguez-Gonzalo, 2023; Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1987; Camps, 2020; Horning & Becker, 2006), especially if it is understood as a recursive and transversal phase that affects all levels of language (Álvarez Angulo, 2011;…
Descriptors: College Students, Collaborative Writing, Revision (Written Composition), Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Maria-Lourdes Lira-Gonzales; Hossein Nassaji; Kuok-Wa Chao Chao – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
An increasing number of studies have explored the effects of collaborative writing on written outcomes; however, few studies have examined the influence of collaborative processing of feedback. This study addresses this gap by focusing on learner engagement. While collaborative writing involves co-authoring a text, which requires negotiation and…
Descriptors: Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maya Usher; Ido Roll; Orly Fuhrman; Ofra Amir – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2025
Online Collaborative Writing (OCW) is a prevalent practice among undergraduate students, yet challenges arising from a lack of group awareness (GA) often hinder effective collaboration. To address such challenges, this study included three phases: (1) A preliminary study (n=9) aimed to identify challenges that undergraduate students face while…
Descriptors: Coordination, Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Editing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Gabriel Michaud; Kim McDonough; Mariane Parent – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
This study examines the impact of written corrective feedback (WCF) timing on the collaborative writing process and writing accuracy development of adult learners of French as a second language. Forty-eight learners were divided into three groups to complete a collaborative writing task in pairs. The first group received immediate WCF via Google…
Descriptors: Time Factors (Learning), Written Language, Feedback (Response), Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ruth Li – Thresholds in Education, 2025
In this article, I introduce a collaborative annotation activity that supports students in critically examining AI-generated writing in relation to criteria including specificity and complexity. I engage students in collaboratively annotating the AI-generated essays, guiding students to identify instances in which the essays could be more…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Computer Assisted Instruction, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mohammad Bagheri – Cogent Education, 2024
Task-based language teaching (TBLT) has occupied an important place in the field of language education; however, some of TBLT dimensions that pertain to the interaction between task design features, written corrective feedback (WCF), and learners' performance have not received adequate attention in past studies. To fill this gap, the current study…
Descriptors: Task Analysis, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language), Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lindsey Harding; Joshua King; Anya Bonanno; Joe Powell – Journal of Response to Writing, 2022
While a great deal is known about instructor response to student writing--from commenting practices to student perceptions--less is known about how feedback impacts students' writing and writerly development. While we set out to study students' explicit engagement with written instructor feedback, our initial experimental design was disrupted by…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Student Reaction, Writing Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xu Li; Shiyan Jiang; Yue Hu; Xiaoxiao Feng; Wenzhi Chen; Fan Ouyang – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
While the importance of feedback in education is well established, the effects of structured knowledge in collaborative academic writing remains uncertain. This study introduces an academic writing feedback tool that combines structured knowledge mining, analysis, and visualization. An empirical experiment was conducted in a second-year university…
Descriptors: Academic Language, Collaborative Writing, Cognitive Structures, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beck, Sarah W.; del Calvo, Andrew O. – Literacy, 2023
Though discipline-specific approaches to literacy instruction can support adolescents' academic literacy and identity development, scant attention has been paid to ways of targeting such instruction to address individual student needs. Dialogic writing assessment is an approach to conducting writing conferences that foregrounds students' composing…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Dialogs (Language), Social Studies, History Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Valizadeh, Mohammadreza – Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2022
Google Docs has recently been suggested as an efficient collaborative tool for group writing. This experimental quantitative study, including pretest-treatment-posttest design, aimed at comparing the effects of collaborative writing on Google Docs and individual writing practice on EFL learners' descriptive paragraphs. The participants were 48…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Collaborative Writing, Technology Uses in Education, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bleakney, Julia; Li, Li; Holland, Emily; Rosinski, Paula; Moore, Jessie L. – Composition Forum, 2021
We report on a survey of students and alumni, examining their "rhetorical training"--their writing knowledge and experiences across multiple courses, campus employment, and workplace contexts. The survey asked participants to identify their most often written genres and their most valued type of writing, the rhetorical situations in…
Descriptors: Rhetoric, Writing Instruction, Writing Processes, Writing Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mazhar Bal; Emre Öztürk – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between technology-supported writing instruction at the K-12 level and deep learning approaches and to understand the trends in this field. In the study, 12 articles selected from Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC and EBSCO databases were systematically analysed. The findings reveal that the…
Descriptors: Learning Processes, Writing Processes, Writing Skills, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Hanson, Kelly; Yaggi Rodak, Miranda – Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 2021
This reflective essay documents the adaptation of an active-learning strategy in response to the spring 2020 global pandemic. We detail how we adapted it from its original form as an intentionally nondigital, face-to-face, team-based activity into a new, fully digital format. We articulate the active-learning methods driving the original design as…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Active Learning, Collaborative Writing, Electronic Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chakraborty, Deya; Soyoof, Ali; Moharami, Mehdi; Utami, Ade Dwi; Zeng, Shaoru; Cong-Lem, Ngo; Hradsky, Danielle; Maestre, Jacky-Lou; Foomani, Elham M.; Pretorius, Lynette – Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 2021
Objective: While academic writing is considered a core competency in academia, academic writing anxiety is ubiquitous in doctoral student cohorts. Doctoral writing groups provide a space for participants to learn from each other's writing through the peer feedback process. In this conceptual review, we explore the dialogic nature of the peer…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Academic Language, Writing (Composition), Doctoral Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Masoud Rahimi; Jalil Fathi; Di Zou – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Grounded in the activity theory, we adopted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to explore the impact of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' academic writing skills (i.e. task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexicon, and grammatical range and accuracy). To this end, two…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Language Tests
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3