Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 14 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 128 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 352 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 729 |
Descriptor
| Federal Legislation | 1344 |
| Individualized Education… | 1211 |
| Disabilities | 801 |
| Educational Legislation | 788 |
| Special Education | 603 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 495 |
| Equal Education | 450 |
| Students with Disabilities | 293 |
| Compliance (Legal) | 264 |
| Student Evaluation | 228 |
| Student Placement | 197 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Parents | 142 |
| Practitioners | 138 |
| Teachers | 79 |
| Administrators | 57 |
| Policymakers | 31 |
| Students | 13 |
| Counselors | 8 |
| Support Staff | 4 |
| Researchers | 3 |
| Community | 2 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 33 |
| Ohio | 28 |
| Pennsylvania | 20 |
| Minnesota | 19 |
| Maryland | 17 |
| New York | 16 |
| Texas | 16 |
| United States | 16 |
| Wisconsin | 16 |
| Louisiana | 15 |
| North Dakota | 15 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 2 |
Peer reviewedBrown, Lou; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1980
If chronological age appropriate and functional curricular content is to be developed, the basic components of an individualized education program (IEP) mandated by P.L. 94-142 (the Education for All Handicapped Children Act) must be supplemented, and instructionally defined for each severely handicapped adolescent or young adult student. (Author)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Federal Legislation, Individualized Education Programs, Program Development
Chandler, Theodore A.; And Others – Education Unlimited, 1980
Two articles focus on the development of individualized education programs (IEPs) as mandated by P.L. 94-142 (the Education for All Handicapped Children Act). (SBH)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Individualized Education Programs
Peer reviewedBrowder, Diane M.; Karvonen, Meagan; Davis, Stephanie; Fallin, Kathy; Courtade-Little, Ginevra – Exceptional Children, 2005
With the passage of No Child Left Behind and the start of the high-stakes accountability movement, it has become increasingly important that teachers are able to appropriately assess all students, including those who qualify for alternate assessments. If suitable assessment is occurring, teachers can use these data to help improve student…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, State Standards, Individualized Instruction, Individualized Education Programs
Gormley, Shannon; Hughes, Charles; Block, Lydia; Lendmann, Christy – Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 2005
In order to gain access to services at universities and colleges, students with learning disabilities must provide documentation of their disability. However, secondary schools are not required by law to provide the documentation often requisite at the postsecondary level. Also, it appears that secondary schools may collect even less psychometric…
Descriptors: Secondary Schools, Eligibility, Learning Disabilities, Federal Legislation
Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Hodgson, Jennifer; Thurlow, Martha L. – National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota, 2010
All students, including students with disabilities, must be included in state accountability systems as required by law. In April 2007, federal regulations provided states the flexibility to offer another assessment option--an Alternate Assessment based on Modified Achievement Standards (AA-MAS) for some students with disabilities. The AA-MAS is…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Alternative Assessment, Outcomes of Education, Disabilities
Omichinski, Donna Riccio; Van Tubbergen, Marie; Warschausky, Seth – Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 2008
A component of a school assessment plan includes traditional IQ testing, often referred to as psychological or psycho-educational testing. Psycho-educational testing can yield information about how a student compares to others in her grade or age group, individual strengths and needs, and recommendations to improve instruction. The intended…
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Psychological Testing, Educational Testing
Conroy, Terrye; Yell, Mitchell L.; Katsiyannis, Antonis – Remedial and Special Education, 2008
On November 14, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in "Schaffer v. Weast." This special education decision concerned which party bears the burden of persuasion when parents challenge a school district's Individualized Education Program (IEP) in a due process hearing. In this article, we define burden of persuasion and…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Individualized Education Programs, Disabilities, Court Litigation
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources. – 1991
This report of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources favorably recommends that Senate Bill 1106, Amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, be passed by the Senate. Noted are the legislation's purposes: to help States facing fiscal crises stay in the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities program (Part H); to reward those…
Descriptors: Agency Cooperation, Compliance (Legal), Costs, Delivery Systems
Mid-East Regional Resource Center, Washington, DC. – 1978
Guidelines for the implementation of individualized education programs (IEPs) for handicapped children are provided. An introductory section details the mandates of Public Law 94-142 (the Education for All Handicapped Children Act) and defines the components of the IEP and a list of eight exceptionalities (with characteristics of each). Section 2…
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Check Lists, Compliance (Legal), Educational Legislation
Mid-East Regional Resource Center, Washington, DC. – 1979
Guidelines for the implementation of individualized education programs (IEPs) for handicapped children are provided. An introductory section details the mandates of Public Law 94-142 (the Education for All Handicapped Children Act) and defines the components of the IEP and a list of 11 exceptionalities. Section 2 discusses assessment, including…
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Check Lists, Compliance (Legal), Educational Legislation
Hobbs, Barbara, Ed. – 1979
Based on data obtained by the Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, the report provides the most recent information on the progress and issues of implementing P.L. 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. An introduction gives a general sense of the progress being made nationwide in implementing the Act. Sections entitled…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Equal Education
Estes, Mary Bailey – Remedial and Special Education, 2009
Fifteen years after the first charter school legislation was passed, the number of charter schools opening in the United States each year continues to grow. In 2000, research was conducted to examine the extent and quality of service to students with disabilities in Texas's charter schools. Descriptive statistics and structured interviews were…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, Disabilities, Educational Quality, Special Education
Podhajski, Blanche; Mather, Nancy; Nathan, Jane; Sammons, Janice – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2009
This article reviews the literature and presents data from a study that examined the effects of professional development in scientifically based reading instruction on teacher knowledge and student reading outcomes. The experimental group consisted of four first- and second-grade teachers and their students (n = 33). Three control teachers and…
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Teacher Characteristics, Oral Reading, Phonemics
Research for Better Schools, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. – 1980
The guide is intended to help clarify P.L. 94-142, The Education For All Handicapped Children Act, and its regulations for administrators. The manual is organized around three central topics: an overview of the law and its regulations (background and purpose of the law, major provisions of the regulations, future of special education); effects of…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Compliance (Legal), Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedBerry, Ronald R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
This decision did not clarify all of the issues involved but did state clearly that if the need arises, a student, regardless of his or her learning disability, can be suspended up to a full 10 days. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Individualized Education Programs

Direct link
